From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UBIFS fixes for 4.19-rc4
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924071904.GB7871@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bdd37c6-17af-e216-d865-fad2c6ff6dae@axentia.se>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:11:55AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> I fredags, den 21 september 2018, 15:53:42 CEST skrev Greg KH:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:33:15AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Greg,
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit ae596de1a0c8c2c924dc99d23c026259372ab234:
> >>
> >> Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared (2018-09-20 15:23:58 +0200)
> >
> > Wow, bold move, new patches with less than 24 hours in your tree. That
> > means linux-next didn't see them :(
> >
> >> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>
> >> git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.git tags/upstream-4.19-rc4
> >
> > Now pulled, but really, don't you think that they should at least go
> > through 0-day first? Maybe no one runs ubifs on mainline kernels...
>
> FWIW, we do...
That's good to know. I was just trying to say that patches asked to be
pulled in, less than 24 hours from when they were added to the
developer's tree, is usually a little "suspect" as they normally have
not had the chance to go through our "CI" systems.
That's all, I wasn't trying to disparage the UBIFS codebase at all :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-24 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-24 7:11 [GIT PULL] UBIFS fixes for 4.19-rc4 Peter Rosin
2018-09-24 7:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-21 9:33 Richard Weinberger
2018-09-21 13:53 ` Greg KH
2018-09-21 14:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-09-21 14:08 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180924071904.GB7871@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox