From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
<indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>, <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit kaslr to choosing the immovable memory
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:04:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180925010411.GA12561@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jK13F7EY--zAVWq-=P2-Lt7n-K05ctL-vH7S=rcWKQoOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 08:48:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> + /*
>> + * If immovable memory found, filter the intersection between
>> + * immovable memory and region to slots_count.
>> + * Otherwise, go on old code.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_immovable_mem; i++) {
>> + struct mem_vector entry;
>> + unsigned long long start, end, entry_end, region_end;
>> +
>> + start = immovable_mem[i].start;
>> + end = start + immovable_mem[i].size;
>> + region_end = region->start + region->size;
>> +
>> + entry.start = clamp(region->start, start, end);
>> + entry_end = clamp(region_end, start, end);
>> +
>> + if (entry.start + image_size < entry_end) {
>
>Can this logic be rewritten to use the existing mem_overlaps() check
>instead? I think that would make it much more readable.
>
Sure, I will reuse mem_overlaps() instead of this logical.
>Otherwise, yes, this all looks fine.
Thank you for the review.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>-Kees
>
>> + entry.size = entry_end - entry.start;
>> + slots_count(&entry, minimum, image_size);
>> +
>> + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> + debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>> /*
>> * Returns true if mirror region found (and must have been processed
>> @@ -720,11 +775,8 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>>
>> region.start = md->phys_addr;
>> region.size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>> - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> - debug_putstr("Aborted EFI scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
>> break;
>> - }
>> }
>> return true;
>> }
>> @@ -751,11 +803,8 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum,
>> continue;
>> region.start = entry->addr;
>> region.size = entry->size;
>> - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>> - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> - debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
>> break;
>> - }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Kees Cook
>Pixel Security
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-25 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-13 10:46 [PATCH v7 0/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-09-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] x86/boot: Add acpitb.c to parse acpi tables Chao Fan
2018-09-22 15:45 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-25 1:12 ` Chao Fan
2018-09-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-09-22 15:46 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit kaslr to choosing the " Chao Fan
2018-09-22 15:48 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-25 1:04 ` Chao Fan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180925010411.GA12561@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox