From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
mingo@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/boot: Add bit fields into xloadflags for 5-level kernel checking
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:54:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926075433.GD2555@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051002020.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 09/05/18 at 10:02am, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > On 09/04/18 01:42, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > >
> > > Switching between 4- and 5-level paging modes (in either direction)
> > > requires paing disabling. It means the code that does the switching has to
> > > be under 4G otherwise we would lose control.
> > >
> > > We handle the switching correctly in kernel decompression code, but not on
> > > kexec caller side.
> > >
> > > XLF_5LEVEL indicates that kernel decompression code can deal with
> > > switching between paging modes and it's safe to jump there in 5-level
> > > paging mode.
> > >
> > > As an alternative we can change kexec to switch to 4-level paging mode
> > > before starting the new kernel. Not sure how hard it will be.
> > >
> >
> > Have a flag saying entering in 5-level mode is fine. However, you really
> > should support returning to 4-level mode in kexec. It is *much* easier to do
> > on the caller side as you have total control of memory allocation there.
>
> Works for a regular kexec, but not for starting a crash kernel....
Agree, it's not appropriate to do this after normal kernel crashed and
prepare to jump to 2nd kernel.
Can this patchset be merged? I will post patches to kexec-tools utility
since it will make use of these flags.
Thanks
Baoquan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-26 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 14:16 [PATCH 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel Baoquan He
2018-08-29 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/boot: Add bit fields into xloadflags for 5-level kernel checking Baoquan He
2018-09-04 2:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-09-04 3:44 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-04 4:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-09-04 5:20 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-04 5:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-09-04 6:06 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-04 6:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-09-04 7:16 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-04 8:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-09-05 4:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2018-09-05 8:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-26 7:54 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2018-08-29 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/kexec/64: Error out if try to jump to old 4-level kernel from 5-level kernel Baoquan He
2018-08-29 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation Baoquan He
2018-08-30 13:50 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-08-30 14:13 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-30 13:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-08-30 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-30 14:27 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-08-30 14:57 ` Baoquan He
2018-08-30 15:01 ` Baoquan He
2018-09-02 20:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180926075433.GD2555@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox