From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE4CC43143 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 07:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFA0204FD for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 07:56:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DDFA0204FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727741AbeI2OX2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:23:28 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:50204 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727508AbeI2OX2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:23:28 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: Nedap ESD1 at mail.skyhub.de Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blast.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ODLdnqEmWjkP; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BD81000329C23FFFEA6A903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bd8:1000:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 19C541EC04DF; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:56:01 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , LKML , Netdev , Linux Crypto Mailing List , David Miller , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Samuel Neves , Andrew Lutomirski , Jean-Philippe Aumasson , Andy Polyakov , Thomas Gleixner , mingo@redhat.com, X86 ML Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/23] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation Message-ID: <20180929075601.GA11115@zn.tnic> References: <20180925145622.29959-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20180925145622.29959-5-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 04:01:53AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > I was wondering about the ordering of these, actually. I've seen s-o-b > on top and s-o-b on bottom of the cc list in lots of commits and > haven't yet divined the One True Position. Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst section 12, first sentence. The SOB chain needs to clearly express the path of the patch from author(s) to the upstream kernel. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.