From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A64CC64EBC for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C902084D for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sirena.org.uk header.i=@sirena.org.uk header.b="naEH1LjV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B6C902084D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727511AbeJDUr4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:47:56 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:51234 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727283AbeJDUr4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:47:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GjUEwFDEyi0T31gyr6yhmj5QuNqGBsKQERskuxCxYuc=; b=naEH1LjVYaP50HRwR2EXWZ7au KIJ5EJIesH4Hc8fKp7ZPcnDQCjkoo18NBybNJjFcv5zV9A+8CzB3qFQKpc85EaHxF65k+9QGaJDGN 9F/pbud0iwWzrKgtkGSiN2S/SsdOLN4WBtsUyecEIpo7lVfcAkyWr9fxRFbf0vNZnVuVU=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=debutante.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g845D-0008SE-TF; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:54:27 +0000 Received: by debutante.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5AFB31121C82; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:54:27 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:54:27 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Linus Walleij Cc: Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Leonard Crestez , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: Use more standard GPIO binding Message-ID: <20181004135427.GE6412@sirena.org.uk> References: <20181004090654.32233-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20181004105031.GD6412@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Safety Third. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > Optional properties: > > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control > > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control > > Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards > > conforming property or would best practice be to call it enable-gpios or > > something? > Oh I didn't think of that really. The gpio-regulator indeed uses > enable-gpio for the same thing. But it complicates things codewise, > as the GPIO line is also optional. I'm a bit uncertain, I tend > to think just "gpios" is fine when the usage is unambigous. but > I don't know what the DT maintainers think. Right, well from my point of view -gpio is perfectly fine also so... :) Rob? --JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlu2G5IACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dv0Af+NqNh4M686tx+nqKIgH4ozAC/fBA1Y2LfN1um8IE7pI7kh21OjK254T0f pigDLEN7pTb7gqtFoAqx3mso846aQMR8mDKaxZgsd67P74gFBfQUoYwcLvxVkkWb bE/EsXlDYkqbzFZrqWTj2RCPK2Y2ReMQ7eyVxg3UUdh8P7wHelzNa3+kQPx6lcu7 x624M/EFb9GMrxedKr+jbHKrnB4rPxhXQ1OTXo/ysHmtBB8nWSIdupX/MzcJJwnn 32orkEn4dnN390oR0lvChpDAD3GeOPevH7vOtbrrCYSWQXjE/QKw15GCuIG0rKEi bSnbpLNwpACAgEjmdwOpQasN0rpbEw== =604p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ--