From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69EFC64EB8 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7564B20652 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Ur17gp1T" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7564B20652 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727619AbeJDVQZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:16:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:52432 "EHLO mail-wm1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727322AbeJDVQY (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:16:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id 189-v6so9255234wmw.2 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:22:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=4cX+peGkduMAOVwdLoobODzAL0aRyiYbiXCALuVGouM=; b=Ur17gp1TkdM1MqtEonMbwvRgFKVBsL4qjNFYcTDir3D5NYYFMkwN+eef1GkG0HUDNw TnHmK7djzYU1xAjtj858jer8wJ6g92V2PxMQuNPONWhxOk/5TBEe2cO6n+qLLLQUbYzz lWCsJxxzICiwcMVapOZzuaARNsy0bP0btZtHg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4cX+peGkduMAOVwdLoobODzAL0aRyiYbiXCALuVGouM=; b=oK2WbvF1kbWu34rG6huYtAXAukD3QuacGH0jIT+yfvBT57U02ixntq6RSt5nnwIkVg tNXGQlcl6CozGZJo49GV+mWXyH916iIFhQEDDs3YBEBIx8Q/Tz8v9hCA/SW8Ln8L2hOG EzOuKUZ2OoPvYusMPwwM2uHXy8ZmCR+DDRUZxBSK5KjDpmtBe9WUvidQ9wfHbu4d8U0S cHyslGipWFseQHXFMZ6ZvsarC8libGozgtm0KIQWjWRddau2Pzk293IerVLtqRQN6y8W 3seewNb77GUF7PJUl3N6rVFRtB+yNfMEemgRjNQ3ZiARq+phvmo6SeJXpCZLlXP3OqQm at3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoj22aTYVE28hq1IuZLnaw7drsKxZCBbo23wrizizRQgqqJu8T19 uOFijAXtPyNwZElRiV+7Q88xUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61JbhaDLOvshtrFtOUeBij4DMfgWgJx9sQgKY2ClJq+H/x60YGZo7iqKfnBQV0Q52u8MMbJNA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:838a:: with SMTP id f132-v6mr5137034wmd.51.1538662971346; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mai (101.142.88.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.88.142.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r131-v6sm4784476wmb.32.2018.10.04.07.22.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:22:47 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , Peter Zijlstra , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] cpuidle: menu: Compute first_idx when latency_req is known Message-ID: <20181004142247.GA1881@mai> References: <3510260.hvypppS8Bs@aspire.rjw.lan> <2172591.2D0LTaJpaX@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2172591.2D0LTaJpaX@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:42:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Since menu_select() can only set first_idx to 1 if the exit latency > of the second state is not greater than the latency limit, it should > first determine that limit. Thus first_idx should be computed after > the "interactivity" factor has been taken into account. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewedy-by: Daniel Lezcano -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog