From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3]: perf record: enable asynchronous trace writing
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:48:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005084854.GE3768@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc944fcf-cbb6-9b88-bc1c-606eb027a6ac@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:31:11AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> On 05.10.2018 10:16, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 07:12:10PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> <SNIP>
> >> +static void record__aio_sync(struct perf_mmap *md)
> >> +{
> >> + struct aiocb *cblock = &md->cblock;
> >> + struct timespec timeout = { 0, 1000 * 1000 * 1 }; // 1ms
> >> +
> >> + do {
> >> + if (cblock->aio_fildes == -1 || record__aio_complete(md, cblock))
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + while (aio_suspend((const struct aiocb**)&cblock, 1, &timeout)) {
> >> + if (!(errno == EAGAIN || errno == EINTR))
> >> + pr_err("failed to sync perf data, error: %m\n");
> >
> > Is there somthing we can do in this error case? Any chance it gets
> > stuck in the loop?
>
> Not really. Currently, in glibc, it can block on a mutex only.
OK, I was thinking of a situation where the aio_suspend() keeps
returning a same error code repeated..
>
> >
> >
> >> + }
> >> + } while (1);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int record__aio_pushfn(void *to, struct aiocb *cblock, void *bf, size_t size)
> >> +{
> >> + off_t off;
> >> + struct record *rec = to;
> >> + int ret, trace_fd = rec->session->data->file.fd;
> >> +
> >> + rec->samples++;
> >> +
> >> + off = lseek(trace_fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
> >> + lseek(trace_fd, off + size, SEEK_SET);
> >
> > It'd be nice if these lseek() could be removed and use
> > rec->bytes_written instead.
>
> Well, this could be implemented like this avoiding lseek() in else branch:
>
> off = lseek(trace_fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
> ret = record__aio_write(cblock, trace_fd, bf, size, off);
> if (!ret) {
> lseek(trace_fd, off + size, SEEK_SET);
> rec->bytes_written += size;
>
> if (switch_output_size(rec))
> trigger_hit(&switch_output_trigger);
> }
Oh I meant the both like:
off = rec->bytes_written;
ret = record__aio_write(cblock, trace_fd, bf, size, off);
if (!ret) {
rec->bytes_written += size;
...
> >
> >
> >> + ret = record__aio_write(cblock, trace_fd, bf, size, off);
> >> + if (!ret) {
> >> + rec->bytes_written += size;
> >> +
> >> + if (switch_output_size(rec))
> >> + trigger_hit(&switch_output_trigger);
> >
> > Doesn't it need the _sync() before the trigger? Maybe it should be
> > moved to record__mmap_read_evlist() or so..
>
> Currently trigger just updates variable state.
> The state is then checked thru separate API at __cmd_record() where
> record__mmap_read_sync() is called prior switching to a new trace file
> or finishing collection.
>
> >>
> <SNIP>
> >> if (map->base) {
> >> +#ifndef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
> >> if (perf_mmap__push(map, rec, record__pushfn) != 0) {
> >> rc = -1;
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >> +#else
> >> + if (!rec->opts.nr_cblocks) {
> >> + if (perf_mmap__push(map, rec, record__pushfn) != 0) {
> >> + rc = -1;
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> + } else {
> >> + /*
> >> + * Call record__aio_sync() to wait till map->data buffer
> >> + * becomes available after previous aio write request.
> >> + */
> >> + record__aio_sync(map);
> >> + if (perf_mmap__aio_push(map, rec, record__aio_pushfn) != 0) {
> >> + rc = -1;
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +#endif
> >
> > If dummy aio functions are provided, the #ifdef can be removed and
> > just use the #else part assuming opts.nr_cblocks == 0.
>
> Yes, it looks a little bit cumbersome. Would this be more compact?
Why not exposing opts.nr_cblocks regardless of the #ifdef? It'll have
0 when it's not compiled in. Then it could be like below (assuming
you have all the dummy aio funcitons):
>
> if (map->base) {
> if (!rec->opts.nr_cblocks) {
> if (perf_mmap__push(map, rec, record__pushfn) != 0) {
> rc = -1;
> goto out;
> }
> } else {
> int idx;
> /*
> * Call record__aio_sync() to wait till map->data buffer
> * becomes available after previous aio write request.
> */
> idx = record__aio_sync(map, false);
> if (perf_mmap__aio_push(map, rec, idx, record__aio_pushfn) != 0) {
> rc = -1;
> goto out;
> }
> }
> }
>
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 15:54 [PATCH v9 0/3]: perf: reduce data loss when profiling highly parallel CPU bound workloads Alexey Budankov
2018-10-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v9 1/3]: perf util: map data buffer for preserving collected data Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 6:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-10-05 7:03 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 7:29 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v9 2/3]: perf record: enable asynchronous trace writing Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 7:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-10-05 8:31 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 8:48 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2018-10-05 9:39 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 10:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-10-05 11:50 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 15:53 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-10-03 16:17 ` [PATCH v9 3/3]: perf record: extend trace writing to multi AIO Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 7:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-10-05 7:54 ` Alexey Budankov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-05 13:35 [PATCH v10 0/3]: perf: reduce data loss when profiling highly parallel CPU bound workloads Alexey Budankov
2018-10-05 13:49 ` [PATCH v9 2/3]: perf record: enable asynchronous trace writing Alexey Budankov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181005084854.GE3768@sejong \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox