From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F201AC65C20 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA7C2087D for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NomxWUiu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BBA7C2087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727790AbeJIBr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:47:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58620 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726427AbeJIBr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:47:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-77-176.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.77.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3443C2089D; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:34:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539023664; bh=qhQoX2OYGHHdWj5nCO9UDBYQO085+6PPu5742qIHMLw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NomxWUiulB8gZTiBAo9CCEDi9dveuU95f7j5Kk5qxoeUTuqDQ55kiddG+YSzznUBG 5cu3q3fsHr+fr+WhQXmSQtUEU77ebX9/ADC+2AoOp6B4vfkSbo5bUkIVMZb7PoODaW 784W2QgJ1b4Gh1mOhEj7IQla60YHZlCjVOiZAziQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , "J. Bruce Fields" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 041/113] nfsd: fix corrupted reply to badly ordered compound Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:30:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20181008175532.835899081@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0 In-Reply-To: <20181008175530.864641368@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181008175530.864641368@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "J. Bruce Fields" [ Upstream commit 5b7b15aee641904ae269be9846610a3950cbd64c ] We're encoding a single op in the reply but leaving the number of ops zero, so the reply makes no sense. Somewhat academic as this isn't a case any real client will hit, though in theory perhaps that could change in a future protocol extension. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c @@ -1632,6 +1632,7 @@ nfsd4_proc_compound(struct svc_rqst *rqs if (status) { op = &args->ops[0]; op->status = status; + resp->opcnt = 1; goto encode_op; }