From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC2FC677D4 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03B82087D for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SzXg9H6w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F03B82087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729177AbeJIBv1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:51:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38240 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726427AbeJIBv0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:51:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-77-176.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.77.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CDF12087D; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:38:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539023902; bh=BA94qm9vOKOZbNAvBqufLthv3icEf7U1z1Vdyw39VcM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SzXg9H6wiVpUsA4bEVCCydpoVTcMP69GY0Q9wd1VkjxRoUjfJ6LhT0C2Lr00eu2Z/ ZJ1JUyn8qawNS6zpAmY6tOXu8kE2NAgWlFE4ILTZx/bdioN9LbOnmF65GgcOX4W1pW oE/NtuBVXAd+J3klhNbt5gsE2uAjvKNLcCHDIk4g= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Whitchurch , Linus Walleij , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 11/59] gpio: Fix crash due to registration race Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 20:31:18 +0200 Message-Id: <20181008175547.749375637@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0 In-Reply-To: <20181008175546.620836256@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181008175546.620836256@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Vincent Whitchurch [ Upstream commit d49b48f088c323dbacae44dfbe56d9c985c8a2a1 ] gpiochip_add_data_with_key() adds the gpiochip to the gpio_devices list before of_gpiochip_add() is called, but it's only the latter which sets the ->of_xlate function pointer. gpiochip_find() can be called by someone else between these two actions, and it can find the chip and call of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate() which leads to the following crash due to a NULL ->of_xlate(). Unhandled prefetch abort: page domain fault (0x01b) at 0x00000000 Modules linked in: leds_gpio(+) gpio_generic(+) CPU: 0 PID: 830 Comm: insmod Not tainted 4.18.0+ #43 Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express PC is at (null) LR is at of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate+0x2c/0x38 Process insmod (pid: 830, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) (of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate) from (gpiochip_find+0x48/0x84) (gpiochip_find) from (of_get_named_gpiod_flags+0xa8/0x238) (of_get_named_gpiod_flags) from (gpiod_get_from_of_node+0x2c/0xc8) (gpiod_get_from_of_node) from (devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child+0xb8/0x144) (devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child) from (gpio_led_probe+0x208/0x3c4 [leds_gpio]) (gpio_led_probe [leds_gpio]) from (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0x9c) (platform_drv_probe) from (really_probe+0x1d0/0x3d4) (really_probe) from (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c0) (driver_probe_device) from (__driver_attach+0x120/0x13c) (__driver_attach) from (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4) (bus_for_each_dev) from (bus_add_driver+0x1a8/0x268) (bus_add_driver) from (driver_register+0x78/0x10c) (driver_register) from (do_one_initcall+0x54/0x1fc) (do_one_initcall) from (do_init_module+0x64/0x1f4) (do_init_module) from (load_module+0x2198/0x26ac) (load_module) from (sys_finit_module+0xe0/0x110) (sys_finit_module) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54) One way to fix this would be to rework the hairy registration sequence in gpiochip_add_data_with_key(), but since I'd probably introduce a couple of new bugs if I attempted that, simply add a check for a non-NULL of_xlate function pointer in of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate(). This works since the driver looking for the gpio will simply fail to find the gpio and defer its probe and be reprobed when the driver which is registering the gpiochip has fully completed its probe. Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static int of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xl struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec = data; return chip->gpiodev->dev.of_node == gpiospec->np && + chip->of_xlate && chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0; }