From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43560C67879 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BBD2087D for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hKz2jcYR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 03BBD2087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726840AbeJIIJW (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:09:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42060 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726786AbeJIIJV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 04:09:21 -0400 Received: from jouet.infradead.org (unknown [179.97.41.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 568532087D; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:54:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539046499; bh=bK97mj6JCpYEiYxawBQbKp6SAOz1PMnV4kKGLtRRamE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hKz2jcYRMtHnarks3QUGbm7waRzKUjJzHXWbVWgNTM+Xk9DlqUxmXHymm+59g0m9O xmCPXZox+jT2QGrcLQdy23Q6XZzM9Q1u+bE15Gn43b5HKCmCUdvt9FvJf+QPEjszZI v90YqssXQlPzuvGBSKko5nIkRG2TK/enB5YXb9nk= From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Richter , Heiko Carstens , Hendrik Brueckner , Martin Schwidefsky , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 03/12] perf test: S390 does not support watchpoints in test 22 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:54:18 -0300 Message-Id: <20181009005427.6607-4-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.4 In-Reply-To: <20181009005427.6607-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20181009005427.6607-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Richter S390 does not support the perf_event_open system call for attribute type PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT. This results in test failure for test 22: [root@s8360046 perf]# ./perf test 22 22: Watchpoint : 22.1: Read Only Watchpoint : FAILED! 22.2: Write Only Watchpoint : FAILED! 22.3: Read / Write Watchpoint : FAILED! 22.4: Modify Watchpoint : FAILED! [root@s8360046 perf]# Add s390 support to avoid these tests being executed on s390 platform: [root@s8360046 perf]# ./perf test 22 [root@s8360046 perf]# ./perf test -v 22 22: Watchpoint : Disabled [root@s8360046 perf]# Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Hendrik Brueckner Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180928105335.67179-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 1 + tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 1 + tools/perf/tests/wp.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c index 54ca7d87236f..12c09e0ece71 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static struct test generic_tests[] = { { .desc = "Watchpoint", .func = test__wp, + .is_supported = test__wp_is_supported, .subtest = { .skip_if_fail = false, .get_nr = test__wp_subtest_get_nr, diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h index 8e26a4148f30..b82f55fcc294 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ int test__unit_number__scnprint(struct test *test, int subtest); int test__mem2node(struct test *t, int subtest); bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void); +bool test__wp_is_supported(void); #if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/wp.c b/tools/perf/tests/wp.c index 017a99317f94..f89e6806557b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/wp.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/wp.c @@ -227,3 +227,15 @@ int test__wp(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int i) return !wp_testcase_table[i].target_func() ? TEST_OK : TEST_FAIL; } + +/* The s390 so far does not have support for + * instruction breakpoint using the perf_event_open() system call. + */ +bool test__wp_is_supported(void) +{ +#if defined(__s390x__) + return false; +#else + return true; +#endif +} -- 2.14.4