From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D482C43441 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EBD20644 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="jOb0gDbS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B4EBD20644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726935AbeJKKCM (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:02:12 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:48638 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726788AbeJKKCM (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:02:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1QfUskeT3ljf/UBXEM80gRQryBwrL9O+Sx402a6eADk=; b=jOb0gDbSKl9AF+D70bVKHHTWX dOJIobxUStvRyxkRB5b6aIRhH4Ua7BBieWuuq2RMivWZwOsOjAxNAppnyUu+oXG/ZqfqIYdd1Fre6 zQgqgMd7W6aqlf4o2FuwkPHJnj8MG5zCyYGCFwiQ+c1YTmQx1iivHRexk5LVH13Qat2/xkc3CRGAB OQZ85/PKCTvrhb7PZBbAQTn89D53FlH5wZk9pW7XMUPkgw0ZG0jJN29hnZ1WRsC9l75WMVT7As2Fw EHNzZEyKwN288lgNw3QZSuF0XGgSx3WRfv1xZPqx3TNtPWkthyEiRuWc7cNYAHsuImHuAwa6CSap4 ZiTV/Q3LA==; Received: from 177.43.144.224.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([177.43.144.224] helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gAQqa-0006jq-Cr; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:37:08 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 23:37:05 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: James Bottomley Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 2/3] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion Message-ID: <20181010233705.12f0f727@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <1539202180.12644.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1539202053.12644.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1539202180.12644.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:09:40 -0700 James Bottomley escreveu: > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outline= d in > the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern > that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the > enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how= this > should be handled. >=20 > Note, this patch is expected to be the starting point for a discussion no= t the > end point, so there is an expectation that an Enforcement section will be > added again to our code of conduct once we have sufficient community cons= ensus > on what it should say. >=20 > Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") > Acked-by: Shuah Khan > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Reviewed-by: Alan Cox > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab I still think that this series should contain a 4th patch removing "responsibilities" with that text proposed by Alan. E. g. instead of: Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject it should say, instead: Maintainers should remove, edit or reject >=20 > --- >=20 > v2: Added additional commit paragraph clarifying we do expect eventually = to > have an enforcement section (as requested by Shuah) > --- > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/pr= ocess/code-of-conduct.rst > index aa40e34e7785..4dd90987305b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -59,21 +59,6 @@ address, posting via an official social media account,= or acting as an appointed > representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a projec= t may be > further defined and clarified by project maintainers. > =20 > -Enforcement > -=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > - > -Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may = be > -reported by contacting the Technical Advisory Board (TAB) at > -. All complaints will be reviewed and > -investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and > -appropriate to the circumstances. The TAB is obligated to maintain > -confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. Further det= ails of > -specific enforcement policies may be posted separately. > - > -Maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good fai= th may > -face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members= of the > -project=E2=80=99s leadership. > - > Attribution > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > =20 Thanks, Mauro