From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
To: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
skannan@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
amit.kucheria@linaro.org, evgreen@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:43:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181011124333.GA10790@centauri.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40719973-21a0-120d-7193-8e6287cbbd18@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 04:45:25PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > WARNING: Duplicate signature
> > #370:
> > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
> >
> > If you are more than one author, you can use the Co-Developed-by tag.
> >
>
> Hmm, I do see multiple SOBs being used and merged.
>
From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
"""
A Co-Developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer
along with the original author. This is useful at times when multiple people
work on a single patch. Note, this person also needs to have a Signed-off-by:
line in the patch as well.
"""
So it is not wrong to have two Signed-off-bys, just that
having the Co-Developed-by tag clearly shows that there
was more than one author.
Without the Co-Developed-by tag, the second Signed-off-by tag
is ambiguous, since the seconds Signed-off-by tag might just
have meant that that person was in the delivery chain of the
patch.
I think that the Co-Developed-by tag is optional, so if the
co-developer doesn't care about taking credit, it can probably
be skipped.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-11 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-23 10:33 [PATCH v8 0/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver Taniya Das
2018-09-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ Firmware bindings Taniya Das
2018-09-27 15:31 ` Rob Herring
2018-10-11 10:31 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-21 20:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-09-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver Taniya Das
2018-10-04 21:04 ` Niklas Cassel
2018-10-11 11:15 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-11 12:43 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2018-10-05 10:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-10-11 11:19 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-08 8:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2018-10-08 9:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-10-08 10:38 ` Niklas Cassel
2018-10-08 10:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-10-08 10:59 ` Taniya Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181011124333.GA10790@centauri.lan \
--to=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=evgreen@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox