From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Matthew Helsley <mhelsley@vmware.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/2] jump_function: Addition of new feature "jump_function"
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 07:52:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181011125258.ihsdmonepaoc5xtb@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181011030738.wwy6grnss67txd2l@treble>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:07:38PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:13:22PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:16:05PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:03:43AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > > > > +#define DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(tramp, func) \
> > > > > > + extern typeof(func) tramp; \
> > > > > > + static void __used __section(.discard.static_call_tramps) \
> > > > > > + *__static_call_tramp_##tramp = tramp
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > Confused. What's the __static_call_tramp_##tramp variable for? And
> > > > > why is a DECLARE_ macro defining a variable?
> > > >
> > > > This is the magic needed for objtool to find all the call sites.
> > > >
> > > > The variable itself isn't needed, but the .discard.static_call_tramps
> > > > entry is. Objtool reads that section to find out which function call
> > > > sites are targeted to a static call trampoline.
> > >
> > > To clarify: objtool reads that section to find out which functions are
> > > really static call trampolines. Then it annotates all the instructions
> > > which call/jmp to those trampolines. Those annotations are then read by
> > > the kernel.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, right, and objtool runs on a per-object basis so it has no other
> > way to know what symbols are actually static calls.
> >
> > There's another way to skin this cat, though:
> >
> > extern typeof(func) __static_call_trampoline_##tramp;
> > #define tramp __static_call_trampoline_##tramp
> >
> > And objtool could recognize it by name. But, of course, you can't put
> > a #define in a macro. But maybe there's a way to hack it up with a
> > static inline?
I went with something similar in the latest version. It's less
surprising in a couple of ways:
- DECLARE_STATIC_CALL doesn't have the magic objtool definition.
- Call sites use the static_call() wrapper, which makes static calls
clearly visible.
#define STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(key) ____static_call_tramp_##key
#define STATIC_CALL_PTR(key) ____static_call_ptr_##key
#define STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(key) __stringify(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(key))
#define STATIC_CALL_PTR_STR(key) __stringify(STATIC_CALL_PTR(key))
#define DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(key, func) \
extern typeof(func) STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(key); \
extern typeof(func) *STATIC_CALL_PTR(key)
#define DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(key, func) \
typeof(func) *STATIC_CALL_PTR(key) = func; \
asm(".pushsection .text, \"ax\" \n" \
".align 4 \n" \
".globl " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(key) " \n" \
".type " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(key) ", @function \n" \
STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(key) ": \n" \
"jmpq *" STATIC_CALL_PTR_STR(key) "(%rip) \n" \
".popsection \n")
#define static_call(key, args...) STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(key)(args)
#define static_call_update(key, func) \
({ \
STATIC_CALL_PTR(key) = func; \
__static_call_update((void **)&STATIC_CALL_PTR(key)); \
})
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-11 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-06 1:51 [POC][RFC][PATCH 0/2] PROOF OF CONCEPT: Dynamic Functions (jump functions) Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 1:51 ` [POC][RFC][PATCH 1/2] jump_function: Addition of new feature "jump_function" Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-06 13:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-06 15:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-06 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-08 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-08 8:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-08 16:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 16:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-08 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-08 17:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 17:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-08 17:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 17:44 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-10-08 17:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-08 17:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-09 2:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-09 3:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-10 17:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-10 18:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-10 18:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-10 18:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-10 21:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-11 3:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-11 12:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-10-11 16:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-10 18:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-10 18:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-10 20:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-10 20:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-08 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-08 11:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-10-09 3:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-10-09 3:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-09 16:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-10-09 8:59 ` David Laight
2018-10-06 1:51 ` [POC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] tracepoints: Implement it with dynamic functions Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181011125258.ihsdmonepaoc5xtb@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhelsley@vmware.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox