From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089AFC5ACC6 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE1A2098A for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xfn703Qw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9BE1A2098A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730657AbeJQBL7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:11:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57334 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729542AbeJQBL5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2018 21:11:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-77-176.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.77.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59CDD2089E; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:20:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539710433; bh=ixrGYlTRel1oyuksAoGqCftHnfgMvlXw5Z5hqdqDy7k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xfn703QwKgmddTfYwJNuLx9Ne2XiGf3IGlSGXELozVcTbI2MalY5mU7mrsPmU/+jN /0d8ajjiS+XckXYa/0PlEnQ4jwGRqmtyzVq19zXBrVzMEGHO9if3AvtVMPKZ6qwsBp TObHM6yvUZFufIrI67zicMWXnl0gEt9OiY+R8YkA= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon Subject: [PATCH 4.14 075/109] arm64: perf: Reject stand-alone CHAIN events for PMUv3 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 19:05:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20181016170528.919490719@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181016170524.530541524@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181016170524.530541524@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Will Deacon commit ca2b497253ad01c80061a1f3ee9eb91b5d54a849 upstream. It doesn't make sense for a perf event to be configured as a CHAIN event in isolation, so extend the arm_pmu structure with a ->filter_match() function to allow the backend PMU implementation to reject CHAIN events early. Cc: Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 7 +++++++ drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 8 +++++++- include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -824,6 +824,12 @@ static int armv8pmu_set_event_filter(str return 0; } +static int armv8pmu_filter_match(struct perf_event *event) +{ + unsigned long evtype = event->hw.config_base & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT; + return evtype != ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CHAIN; +} + static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info) { struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = (struct arm_pmu *)info; @@ -970,6 +976,7 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu cpu_pmu->reset = armv8pmu_reset, cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1, cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv8pmu_set_event_filter; + cpu_pmu->filter_match = armv8pmu_filter_match; return 0; } --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c @@ -483,7 +483,13 @@ static int armpmu_filter_match(struct pe { struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu); unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus); + int ret; + + ret = cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus); + if (ret && armpmu->filter_match) + return armpmu->filter_match(event); + + return ret; } static ssize_t armpmu_cpumask_show(struct device *dev, --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct arm_pmu { void (*stop)(struct arm_pmu *); void (*reset)(void *); int (*map_event)(struct perf_event *event); + int (*filter_match)(struct perf_event *event); int num_events; u64 max_period; bool secure_access; /* 32-bit ARM only */