From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel-ssc: Fix section annotation on atmel_ssc_get_driver_data
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 20:16:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181017181625.GW17341@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181017170901.13119-1-natechancellor@gmail.com>
On 17/10/2018 10:09:02-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After building the kernel with Clang, the following section mismatch
> warning appears:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3bf19a6): Section mismatch in reference from
> the function ssc_probe() to the function
> .init.text:atmel_ssc_get_driver_data()
> The function ssc_probe() references
> the function __init atmel_ssc_get_driver_data().
> This is often because ssc_probe lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of atmel_ssc_get_driver_data is wrong.
>
> Remove __init from atmel_ssc_get_driver_data to get rid of the mismatch.
>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
I would add:
Fixes: 5c86ac695c7e ("ASoC: atmel-ssc: use module_platform_driver macro")
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Alternatively, ssc_probe could be marked as __init, I don't think there
> is any way for the probe to defer. I decided to go with the more
> conservative option first but I'm happy to respin if necessary.
>
A probe function should never be marked __init, unless you ensure there
is no way to bind/unbind the driver at runtime.
> Thanks!
>
> drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> index b2a0340f277e..d8e3cc2dc747 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_ssc_dt_ids[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_ssc_dt_ids);
> #endif
>
> -static inline const struct atmel_ssc_platform_data * __init
> +static inline const struct atmel_ssc_platform_data *
> atmel_ssc_get_driver_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> --
> 2.19.1
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-17 17:09 [PATCH] misc: atmel-ssc: Fix section annotation on atmel_ssc_get_driver_data Nathan Chancellor
2018-10-17 18:16 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2018-10-17 18:20 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-10-17 18:31 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181017181625.GW17341@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox