From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: intel: pinctrl-baytrail: simplify getting .driver_data
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:17:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022081718.GQ2302@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181021211951.GM10650@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:19:51AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:00:27PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
> > platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
> >
>
> Thanks!
>
> I see only 3 out of 5 patches.
>
> Since we are about to establish a separate tree as well as an additional record
> in MAINTAINERS data base for Intel pinctrl driver, I ask you to resend only
> Intel related stuff in a separate series.
Well, it is easy enough to apply to our tree even if part of larger
series :) So no need to resend anything IMHO.
Looks good to me,
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-21 20:00 [PATCH 0/5] pinctrl: simplify getting .driver_data Wolfram Sang
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: intel: pinctrl-baytrail: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-21 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-10-22 8:17 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2018-10-22 10:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-10-30 13:22 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: intel: pinctrl-cherryview: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-22 8:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: intel: pinctrl-intel: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-22 8:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: pinctrl-amd: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-30 13:16 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: pinctrl-at91-pio4: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-24 11:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-10-29 14:32 ` Ludovic Desroches
2018-10-30 13:24 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022081718.GQ2302@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox