From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:12:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026191231.GG3353@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b81c999-9039-94e9-7a74-cdbd48fca08b@linux.intel.com>
Em Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:07:40PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> On 10/26/2018 3:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So, I'm adding the following to my tree to help in diagnosing problems
> > with this overwrite mode:
> Actually, you can use per-event overwrite term to disable overwrite mode for
> perf top.
> /*
> * Check per-event overwrite term.
> * perf top should support consistent term for all events.
> * - All events don't have per-event term
> * E.g. "cpu/cpu-cycles/,cpu/instructions/"
> * Nothing change, return 0.
> * - All events have same per-event term
> * E.g. "cpu/cpu-cycles,no-overwrite/,cpu/instructions,no-overwrite/
> * Using the per-event setting to replace the opts->overwrite if
> * they are different, then return 0.
> * - Events have different per-event term
> * E.g. "cpu/cpu-cycles,overwrite/,cpu/instructions,no-overwrite/"
> * Return -1
> * - Some of the event set per-event term, but some not.
> * E.g. "cpu/cpu-cycles/,cpu/instructions,no-overwrite/"
> * Return -1
> */
> static int perf_top__overwrite_check(struct perf_top *top)
> {
I see, it will disable that opts->overwrite if it finds the no-overwrite
in the per-event definition, so the equivalent of the option I added
below:
perf top --no-overwrite
is:
perf top -e cycles/no-overwrite/
I checked and both have the same result. But I still think there is
value in having the shorter form, ok?
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
> >
> > From 40feb09001c7cc2ba8aeaa0a8f03b6d28fa4ca95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:55:23 -0300
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf top: Allow disabling the overwrite mode
> >
> > In ebebbf082357 ("perf top: Switch default mode to overwrite mode") we
> > forgot to leave a way to disable that new default, add a --overwrite
> > option that can be disabled using --no-overwrite, since the code already
> > in such a way that we can readily disable this mode.
> >
> > This is useful when investigating bugs with this mode like the recent
> > report from David Miller where lots of unknown symbols appear due to
> > disabling the events while processing them which disables all record
> > types, not just PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, which makes it impossible to resolve
> > maps when we lose PERF_RECORD_MMAP records.
> >
> > This can be easily seen while building a kernel, when there are lots of
> > short lived processes.
> >
> > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> > Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-oqgsz2bq4kgrnnajrafcdhie@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt | 5 +++++
> > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> > index 114fda12aa49..d4be6061fe1c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> > +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> > @@ -242,6 +242,11 @@ Default is to monitor all CPUS.
> > --hierarchy::
> > Enable hierarchy output.
> > +--overwrite::
> > + This is the default, but for investigating problems with it or any other strange
> > + behaviour like lots of unknown samples, we may want to disable this mode by using
> > + --no-overwrite.
> > +
> > --force::
> > Don't do ownership validation.
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> > index d21d8751e749..214fad747b04 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> > @@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv)
> > "Show raw trace event output (do not use print fmt or plugins)"),
> > OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "hierarchy", &symbol_conf.report_hierarchy,
> > "Show entries in a hierarchy"),
> > + OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "overwrite", &top.record_opts.overwrite,
> > + "Use a backward ring buffer, default: yes"),
> > OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "force", &symbol_conf.force, "don't complain, do it"),
> > OPT_UINTEGER(0, "num-thread-synthesize", &top.nr_threads_synthesize,
> > "number of thread to run event synthesize"),
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 17:45 A concern about overflow ring buffer mode David Miller
2018-10-26 18:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 18:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 19:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 19:07 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-26 19:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-10-26 19:16 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-26 19:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 20:11 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-26 20:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 13:03 ` [PATCHES/RFC] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 14:33 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 15:11 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 17:43 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 17:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 17:40 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 17:42 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 17:48 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 18:20 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 18:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 22:32 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 22:42 ` David Miller
2018-10-30 1:54 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 21:16 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 17:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-30 19:05 ` David Miller
2018-10-31 22:03 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf top: Do not use overwrite mode by default tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181026191231.GG3353@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox