From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com,
patrick.bellasi@arm.com, pjt@google.com, bsegall@google.com,
thara.gopinath@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sched/fair: update scale invariance of PELT
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:49:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181030091938.GE27587@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1540570303-6097-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Hi Vincent,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 06:11:43PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 6806c27..7a69673 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -674,9 +674,8 @@ static u64 sched_vslice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> return calc_delta_fair(sched_slice(cfs_rq, se), se);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #include "pelt.h"
> -#include "sched-pelt.h"
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int cpu);
> static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> @@ -764,7 +763,7 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
> * such that the next switched_to_fair() has the
> * expected state.
> */
> - se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq);
> + se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
> return;
> }
> }
> @@ -3466,7 +3465,7 @@ static void detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
> /* Update task and its cfs_rq load average */
> static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> {
> - u64 now = cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq);
> + u64 now = cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
> struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> int decayed;
> @@ -6694,6 +6693,12 @@ done: __maybe_unused;
> if (new_tasks > 0)
> goto again;
>
> + /*
> + * rq is about to be idle, check if we need to update the
> + * lost_idle_time of clock_pelt
> + */
> + update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
> +
> return NULL;
> }
Do you think it is better to call this from pick_next_task_idle()? I don't see
any functional difference, but it may be easier to follow.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-30 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 16:11 [PATCH v5 0/2] sched/fair: update scale invariance of PELT Vincent Guittot
2018-10-26 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/fair: move rq_of helper function Vincent Guittot
2018-10-26 16:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] sched/fair: update scale invariance of PELT Vincent Guittot
2018-10-30 9:19 ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2018-10-30 10:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-10-31 7:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-10-31 9:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-11-01 9:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-11-05 7:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-11-02 15:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-11-05 9:10 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-11-05 14:58 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-11-06 14:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-11-06 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-07 10:47 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-11-07 12:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-11-08 11:35 ` Quentin Perret
2018-11-08 16:04 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181030091938.GE27587@codeaurora.org \
--to=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).