public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64 tools build failure wrt smp_load_{acquire,release} expansion on gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:44:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031174408.GA27871@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181031154550.GA28340@kernel.org>

Hi Arnaldo,

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:45:50PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> So I noticed the following build failure thare point to:
> 
> commit 09d62154f61316f7e97eae3f31ef8770c7e4b386
> Author: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Date:   Fri Oct 19 15:51:02 2018 +0200
> 
>     tools, perf: add and use optimized ring_buffer_{read_head, write_tail} helpers
> 
> -------------------------
> 
>   50 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64          : FAIL aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
>   
> Works well with:
> 
>   59 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64          : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) 7.3.0
> 
> And all the other environments I test build :-)

Cheers for reporting this. I managed to reproduce the build failure with
gcc version 6.3.0 20170516 (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1).

The code in question is the arm64 versions of smp_load_acquire() and
smp_store_release(). Unlike other architectures, these are not built
around READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() since we have instructions we can
use instead of fences. Bringing our macros up-to-date with those (i.e.
tweaking the union initialisation and using the special "uXX_alias_t"
types) appears to fix the issue for me.

Diff below...

Will

--->8

diff --git a/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
index 12835ea0e417..378c051fa177 100644
--- a/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -14,74 +14,75 @@
 #define wmb()		asm volatile("dmb ishst" ::: "memory")
 #define rmb()		asm volatile("dmb ishld" ::: "memory")
 
-#define smp_store_release(p, v)					\
-do {								\
-	union { typeof(*p) __val; char __c[1]; } __u =		\
-		{ .__val = (__force typeof(*p)) (v) }; 		\
-								\
-	switch (sizeof(*p)) {					\
-	case 1:							\
-		asm volatile ("stlrb %w1, %0"			\
-				: "=Q" (*p)			\
-				: "r" (*(__u8 *)__u.__c)	\
-				: "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	case 2:							\
-		asm volatile ("stlrh %w1, %0"			\
-				: "=Q" (*p)			\
-				: "r" (*(__u16 *)__u.__c)	\
-				: "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	case 4:							\
-		asm volatile ("stlr %w1, %0"			\
-				: "=Q" (*p)			\
-				: "r" (*(__u32 *)__u.__c)	\
-				: "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	case 8:							\
-		asm volatile ("stlr %1, %0"			\
-				: "=Q" (*p)			\
-				: "r" (*(__u64 *)__u.__c)	\
-				: "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	default:						\
-		/* Only to shut up gcc ... */			\
-		mb();						\
-		break;						\
-	}							\
+#define smp_store_release(p, v)						\
+do {									\
+	union { typeof(*p) __val; char __c[1]; } __u =			\
+		{ .__val = (v) }; 					\
+									\
+	switch (sizeof(*p)) {						\
+	case 1:								\
+		asm volatile ("stlrb %w1, %0"				\
+				: "=Q" (*p)				\
+				: "r" (*(__u8_alias_t *)__u.__c)	\
+				: "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	case 2:								\
+		asm volatile ("stlrh %w1, %0"				\
+				: "=Q" (*p)				\
+				: "r" (*(__u16_alias_t *)__u.__c)	\
+				: "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	case 4:								\
+		asm volatile ("stlr %w1, %0"				\
+				: "=Q" (*p)				\
+				: "r" (*(__u32_alias_t *)__u.__c)	\
+				: "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	case 8:								\
+		asm volatile ("stlr %1, %0"				\
+				: "=Q" (*p)				\
+				: "r" (*(__u64_alias_t *)__u.__c)	\
+				: "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	default:							\
+		/* Only to shut up gcc ... */				\
+		mb();							\
+		break;							\
+	}								\
 } while (0)
 
-#define smp_load_acquire(p)					\
-({								\
-	union { typeof(*p) __val; char __c[1]; } __u;		\
-								\
-	switch (sizeof(*p)) {					\
-	case 1:							\
-		asm volatile ("ldarb %w0, %1"			\
-			: "=r" (*(__u8 *)__u.__c)		\
-			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	case 2:							\
-		asm volatile ("ldarh %w0, %1"			\
-			: "=r" (*(__u16 *)__u.__c)		\
-			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	case 4:							\
-		asm volatile ("ldar %w0, %1"			\
-			: "=r" (*(__u32 *)__u.__c)		\
-			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	case 8:							\
-		asm volatile ("ldar %0, %1"			\
-			: "=r" (*(__u64 *)__u.__c)		\
-			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");			\
-		break;						\
-	default:						\
-		/* Only to shut up gcc ... */			\
-		mb();						\
-		break;						\
-	}							\
-	__u.__val;						\
+#define smp_load_acquire(p)						\
+({									\
+	union { typeof(*p) __val; char __c[1]; } __u =			\
+		{ .__c = { 0 } };					\
+									\
+	switch (sizeof(*p)) {						\
+	case 1:								\
+		asm volatile ("ldarb %w0, %1"				\
+			: "=r" (*(__u8_alias_t *)__u.__c)		\
+			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	case 2:								\
+		asm volatile ("ldarh %w0, %1"				\
+			: "=r" (*(__u16_alias_t *)__u.__c)		\
+			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	case 4:								\
+		asm volatile ("ldar %w0, %1"				\
+			: "=r" (*(__u32_alias_t *)__u.__c)		\
+			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	case 8:								\
+		asm volatile ("ldar %0, %1"				\
+			: "=r" (*(__u64_alias_t *)__u.__c)		\
+			: "Q" (*p) : "memory");				\
+		break;							\
+	default:							\
+		/* Only to shut up gcc ... */				\
+		mb();							\
+		break;							\
+	}								\
+	__u.__val;							\
 })
 
 #endif /* _TOOLS_LINUX_ASM_AARCH64_BARRIER_H */

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-31 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31 15:45 arm64 tools build failure wrt smp_load_{acquire,release} expansion on gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-31 17:44 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-10-31 18:08   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-10-31 21:14     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-11-01  9:13       ` Will Deacon
2018-11-06 19:09   ` [tip:perf/urgent] tools headers barrier: Fix arm64 tools build failure wrt smp_load_{acquire,release} tip-bot for Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181031174408.GA27871@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox