linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"leo.yan@linaro.org" <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Add fallback functions for cases where cpumode is insufficient
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:36:15 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181105193615.GG7077@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <363DA0ED52042842948283D2FC38E4649C313381@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>

Em Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 07:21:44PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian escreveu:
> > In Monday, November 5, 2018 7:30 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote
<SNIP>
> > > +struct map *thread__find_map_fallback(struct thread *thread, u8
> > cpumode,
> > > +				      u64 addr, struct addr_location *al) {

> > You named one as _fallback...

> > > +	struct map *map = thread__find_map(thread, cpumode, addr, al);
> > > +	struct machine *machine = thread->mg->machine;
> > > +	u8 addr_cpumode = machine__addr_cpumode(machine, cpumode,
> > addr);
> > > +
> > > +	if (map || addr_cpumode == cpumode)
> > > +		return map;
> > > +
> > > +	return thread__find_map(thread, addr_cpumode, addr, al); }
> > > +
> > >  struct symbol *thread__find_symbol(struct thread *thread, u8 cpumode,
> > >  				   u64 addr, struct addr_location *al)  { @@ -
> > 1585,6 +1603,15 @@
> > > struct symbol *thread__find_symbol(struct thread *thread, u8 cpumode,
> > >  	return al->sym;
> > >  }

> > > +struct symbol *thread__find_symbol_fb(struct thread *thread, u8
> > cpumode,
> > > +				      u64 addr, struct addr_location *al)

> > ... and the other as _fb, make it consistent, please.

> ok

> > > +{
> > > +	al->sym = NULL;
> > > +	if (thread__find_map_fallback(thread, cpumode, addr, al))
> > > +		al->sym = map__find_symbol(al->map, al->addr);
> > > +	return al->sym;
> > > +}

> > >  /*
> > >   * Callers need to drop the reference to al->thread, obtained in
> > >   * machine__findnew_thread()
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > index 111ae858cbcb..04edc0eac376 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > @@ -2542,6 +2542,46 @@ int machine__get_kernel_start(struct machine
> > *machine)
> > >  	return err;
> > >  }

> > > +/*
> > > + * machine__single_ku_as - Machine has same address space for kernel
> > and user.
> > > + * @machine: machine object
> > > + *
> > > + * Some architectures have a single address space for kernel and user
> > > +addresses,
> > > + * which makes it possible to determine if an address is in kernel
> > > +space or user
> > > + * space.
> > > + */
> > > +static bool machine__single_ku_as(struct machine *machine) {
> > > +	return strcmp(perf_env__arch(machine->env), "sparc"); }

> > Can we avoid having this strcmp be done repeatedly?
 
> It is only done if there are mapping errors
 
>  > Can we avoid having this strcmp be done repeatedly? I.e. just make this a
> > boolean initialized at session start, when machine->env is setup, so we'd
> > have:

> >    machine->single_address_space

> > Instead of a function?
 
> Sure  thing.

Thanks
 
> > 
> > Also have you considered making this fallback to be performed only from
> > code that is that arch specific?
> > 
> > I.e. the code that supports branch samples/stacks is x86_86 specific at this
> > point and thus only in that case we would call the routines that perform the
> > fallback, which, in turn, wouldn't need to check for "sparc"?
 
> I will look at it, but theoretically someone could be processing x86 data but
> doing it on a machine of a different architecture.

Right, that should be supported, yes. What I meant was that when
processing perf.data file with samples where the cpumode can't be
inferred, we should use the fallback routines.

It is super unfortunate that we have addresses without a accompanying
cpumode :-\ Don't you think those coulde be fixed somehow? If this comes
from things synthesized from Intel PT traces, then we can use the
address ranges for kernel/userspace to derive that before hitting the
core code, that would be fed with addr/cpumode pairs, just like we have
hdr.misc & USER/KERNEL and the PERF_CONTEXT_ markers in callchains.

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-05 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31  9:10 [PATCH 0/5] perf tools: Fix for cases where cpumode is incorrect or insufficient Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Add fallback functions for cases where cpumode is insufficient Adrian Hunter
2018-11-05 17:29   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-11-05 18:19     ` David Miller
2018-11-05 19:21     ` Hunter, Adrian
2018-11-05 19:36       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-11-05 19:53         ` Hunter, Adrian
2018-11-05 20:31           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-11-26 19:02           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-11-26 19:41             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-11-26 19:44               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-31  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf tools: Use fallback for sample_addr_correlates_sym() cases Adrian Hunter
2018-11-03 17:46   ` Hunter, Adrian
2018-10-31  9:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf tools: Use fallbacks for branch stacks Adrian Hunter
2018-11-05 17:56   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-31  9:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf intel-pt: Insert callchain context into synthesized callchains Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31 13:28   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-31 14:15     ` Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31 14:20       ` Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31 14:27         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-31 22:12         ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31 14:26       ` [PATCH 4/5] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-31  9:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf intel-pt/bts: Calculate cpumode for synthesized samples Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31 22:13   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2018-10-31 13:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf tools: Fix for cases where cpumode is incorrect or insufficient Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181105193615.GG7077@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).