Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/property: Introduce of_fwnode_name()

[Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:50:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:17 AM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of always being forced to read the "name" property
> > in fwnode_name() with of_nodes, implementing the fwnode
> > operation meant for getting the node name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/of/property.c | 6 ++++++
> 
> Please Cc the DT list for DT changes.

OK.

> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> > index f46828e3b082..ac7b0b6c2d4d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> > @@ -823,6 +823,11 @@ static void of_fwnode_put(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> >         of_node_put(to_of_node(fwnode));
> >  }
> >
> > +static const char *of_fwnode_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > +       return to_of_node(fwnode)->name;
> 
> I'm trying to get rid of the DT name ptr, so please don't add one. You
> can use of_node_full_name() here instead if "<name>@<unit-address>"
> instead of <name> is fine. Otherwise, you've got to allocate your own
> storage and use "%pOFn" printf specifier.

OK, I'll use of_node_full_name().

thanks,

-- 
heikki