From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON discussion
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:50:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107214929-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5BE3A430.7030505@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:49:20AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 11:27 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> + LKML
>
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 02:29:02PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks again for reviewing so many versions of patches, and I learnt a lot from
> > > your comments.
> > >
> > >
> > > While I’m writing the virtio-balloon spec patches, I’m thinking probably we
> > > don’t need VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON to limit
> > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT, because now the guest frees the allocated
> > > pages after the migration is done (that is, the skipped free pages will be
> > > poisoned when the guest is already on the destination machine).
> > The concern was this:
> >
> > guest poisons the page by writing a non-0 pattern there
> > guest sends page to host
> > VM is migrated, page is unmapped
> > guest reads page, zero page is mapped
>
> Not sure about this one: I think guest wouldn't read the page,
> since they are held by balloon (balloon itself will also
> not read it, the page just stays on a list waiting to be freed).
> Please see the below example.
>
> > guest sees 0 in page and detects it as use after free
>
> - balloon collects (i.e. alloc) a free page X (now it
> has 0xaa poison value) and reports X to host to be skipped in
> migration;
> - Now VM is migrated to the destination, and on the destination
> side, X is not mapped initially.
> - Nobody will access X since it has been taken by balloon
> and stays on a list waiting to be freed. So the first chance
> that will get X mapped will be the moment that balloon
> returns X to mm via free(), as free() writes the
> poison value to X.
>
>
> Best,
> Wei
Oh I see, that was with the previous design where we bypassed alloc.
I think you are right, but better stress-test it.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73DE40B6C@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <20181107102538-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
2018-11-08 2:49 ` virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON discussion Wei Wang
2018-11-08 2:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-11-08 3:01 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181107214929-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox