From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAC8C43441 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4221C20825 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LO5q3O5B" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4221C20825 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728635AbeKJDLt (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 22:11:49 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45580 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728169AbeKJDLs (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 22:11:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [131.107.159.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07AB720825; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541784616; bh=iyI/hbmy46o35RqNWVQfJMo632zfTpKvxFoQw538i8U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LO5q3O5BdE9txruBXs1J7l+8XT4pZ9boGJiavtegdltBZvt00fM7cYQaKqSn0yzRy JCUyEyXzOZ9qtCyUHb5miSOLLyzINcHhmQyh3CkbkXR854/nQIrQBizt/agg3VAP7D BwaU/hlhajeQuq5eIlZ191CAJS7VtA8VwOxZguBI= Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:30:15 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , bunk@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable , "Chiang, AlanX" , "Yeh, Andy" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 01/31] eeprom: at24: Add support for address-width property Message-ID: <20181109173015.GD14882@sasha-vm> References: <20181108215129.641434673@linuxfoundation.org> <20181108215129.753982396@linuxfoundation.org> <20181109111604.GB26335@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >pt., 9 lis 2018 o 12:16 Greg Kroah-Hartman > napisał(a): >> >> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:48:32AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> > czw., 8 lis 2018 o 23:08 Greg Kroah-Hartman >> > napisał(a): >> > > >> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> > > >> > >> > Hi Greg, >> > >> > this looks like a new feature, not a fix. Are you sure this should go >> > into the stable branch? >> >> Adrian Bunk asked for it to be included as he said it was a good "quirk" >> support for some hardware enablement issues. >> >> If you think it should be dropped, I'll be glad to do so, but it seems >> harmless to me. >> > >Nah I'm fine, it just seemed like it didn't really fulfill the >requirements for stable. >From my understanding this patch enabled the use of new devices, even though the description of the patch doesn't specify that. -- Thanks, Sasha