[PATCH 4.18 043/350] bpf: do not blindly change rlimit in reuseport net selftest

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-11-11T22:29:39Z

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 262f9d811c7608f1e74258ceecfe1fa213bdf912 ]

If the current process has unlimited RLIMIT_MEMLOCK,
we should should leave it as is.

Fixes: 941ff6f11c02 ("bpf: fix rlimit in reuseport net selftest")
Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
@@ -437,14 +437,19 @@ void enable_fastopen(void)
}
}

-static struct rlimit rlim_old, rlim_new;
+static struct rlimit rlim_old;

static __attribute__((constructor)) void main_ctor(void)
{
getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_old);
- rlim_new.rlim_cur = rlim_old.rlim_cur + (1UL << 20);
- rlim_new.rlim_max = rlim_old.rlim_max + (1UL << 20);
- setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
+
+ if (rlim_old.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY) {
+ struct rlimit rlim_new;
+
+ rlim_new.rlim_cur = rlim_old.rlim_cur + (1UL << 20);
+ rlim_new.rlim_max = rlim_old.rlim_max + (1UL << 20);
+ setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
+ }
}

static __attribute__((destructor)) void main_dtor(void)