From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] proc: add /proc/<pid>/thread_state
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:31:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181112053147.GA78520@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181108101729.GP9761@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 07:32:46AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Expose the per-task cpu specific thread state value, it's helpful
> > > for userland to classify and schedule the tasks by different policies
> >
> > That's pretty vague - what exactly would use this information? I'm sure
> > you have a usecase in mind - could you please describe it?
>
> Yeah, "thread_state" is a pretty terrible name for this. The use-case is
> detectoring which tasks use AVX3 such that a userspace component (think
> job scheduler) can cluster them together.
I'd prefer the kernel to do such clustering...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-12 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-06 18:23 [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] x86/fpu: detect AVX task Aubrey Li
2018-11-06 18:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] proc: add /proc/<pid>/thread_state Aubrey Li
2018-11-08 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-08 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-08 14:03 ` Li, Aubrey
2018-11-12 5:31 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-11-12 7:53 ` Li, Aubrey
2018-11-12 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-12 14:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2018-11-07 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] x86/fpu: detect AVX task Tim Chen
2018-11-08 0:31 ` Li, Aubrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181112053147.GA78520@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox