public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [REGRESSION 4.20-rc1] 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds")
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:54:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113135453.GW9144@intel.com> (raw)

Hi Paul,

After 4.20-rc1 some of my 32bit UP machines no longer reboot/shutdown.
I bisected this down to commit 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched
API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds").

I traced the hang into
-> cpufreq_suspend()
 -> cpufreq_stop_governor()
  -> cpufreq_dbs_governor_stop()
   -> gov_clear_update_util()
    -> synchronize_sched()
     -> synchronize_rcu()

Only PREEMPT=y is affected for obvious reasons, but that couldn't
explain why the same UP kernel booted on an SMP machine worked fine.
Eventually I realized that the difference between working and
non-working machine was IOAPIC vs. PIC. With initcall_debug I saw
that we mask everything in the PIC before cpufreq is shut down,
and came up with the following fix:

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 7aa3dcad2175..f88bf3c77fc0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2605,4 +2605,4 @@ static int __init cpufreq_core_init(void)
        return 0;
 }
 module_param(off, int, 0444);
-core_initcall(cpufreq_core_init);
+late_initcall(cpufreq_core_init);

Here's the resulting change in inutcall_debug:
  pci 0000:00:00.1: shutdown
  hub 4-0:1.0: hub_ext_port_status failed (err = -110)
  agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: shutdown
+ PM: Calling cpufreq_suspend+0x0/0x100
  PM: Calling mce_syscore_shutdown+0x0/0x10
  PM: Calling i8259A_shutdown+0x0/0x10
- PM: Calling cpufreq_suspend+0x0/0x100
+ reboot: Restarting system
+ reboot: machine restart

I didn't really look into what other ramifications the cpufreq
initcall change might have. cpufreq_global_kobject worries
me a bit. Maybe that one has to remain in core_initcall() and
we could just move the suspend to late_initcall()? Anyways,
I figured I'd leave this for someone more familiar with the
code to figure out ;) 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-13 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-13 13:54 Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-11-13 15:10 ` [REGRESSION 4.20-rc1] 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds") Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-14 20:20   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-26 22:01     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-05  5:07       ` Tom Li
2019-02-05  9:58         ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-02-05 13:05           ` Tom Li
2019-02-05 18:59             ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-02-06  1:22               ` tomli
2019-04-15 13:35       ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-15 14:07         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181113135453.GW9144@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox