From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3291C43441 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FE02148E for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jYzQBs0h" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 88FE02148E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728071AbeKUQmf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:42:35 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47628 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725939AbeKUQmf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:42:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD89C2145D; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:09:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1542780570; bh=f5TBPQfhMwVNMoe0+TDI3N5j0J2pHnXV0q3Ds9ZQRTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jYzQBs0h74XnemKDTWRtdhV58ejTTxlZgmJcWOGZjC+nVnL475gZp7ZaBZ7zRCpMC Hl3BspC8V/ukJRwzKIfDhcAvKqOki8tl7pRDlrkmPlvw9me5WTa0Kiw54rl9tJsiEm T2Qe30uxxPYCSd2RWD+Q73tRarcEI5c/ra1uNQq8= Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:09:27 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Cristian Sicilia Cc: Vaibhav Hiremath , Johan Hovold , Alex Elder , Vaibhav Agarwal , Mark Greer , Rui Miguel Silva , David Lin , Viresh Kumar , Bryan O'Donoghue , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Parenthesis alignment Message-ID: <20181121060927.GA27771@kroah.com> References: <1542569289-19899-1-git-send-email-sicilia.cristian@gmail.com> <20181120094358.GA8089@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:42:05PM +0100, Cristian Sicilia wrote: > Thanks for note > > Can make sense do the patch for function that stay in the line but is not > aligned, or is better doesn't change anything? > Like this: > > static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_capabilities(struct gb_camera *gcam, > - char *buf, size_t len) > + char *buf, size_t len) If you really want to, sure :) greg k-h