public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robdclark@gmail.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	sboyd@kernel.org, tfiga@chromium.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org,
	sricharan@codeaurora.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	architt@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:37:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181121173757.GA9801@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181116112430.31248-3-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Given that you're doing the get/put in the TLBI ops unconditionally:

>  static void arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  
> -	if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
> +	if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
> +		arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>  		smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_flush_all(smmu_domain);
> +		arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  
> -	if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
> +	if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
> +		arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>  		smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_sync(smmu_domain);
> +		arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	}

Why do you need them around the map/unmap calls as well?

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-21 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-16 11:24 [RESEND PATCH v17 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-11-21 17:37   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-11-22 12:02     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 18:36       ` Will Deacon
2018-11-26  6:03         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 11:26           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 19:31             ` Will Deacon
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-11-21 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2018-11-23  9:13     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23  9:22       ` Tomasz Figa
2018-11-23  9:36         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 18:34           ` Will Deacon
2018-11-26  4:02             ` Tomasz Figa
2018-11-26 10:55             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 14:41               ` Thor Thayer
2018-11-26 17:55                 ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181121173757.GA9801@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox