From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robdclark@gmail.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
sboyd@kernel.org, tfiga@chromium.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org,
sricharan@codeaurora.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
architt@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:37:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181121173757.GA9801@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181116112430.31248-3-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Given that you're doing the get/put in the TLBI ops unconditionally:
> static void arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> {
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>
> - if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
> + if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
> + arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_flush_all(smmu_domain);
> + arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> + }
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> {
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>
> - if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
> + if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
> + arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_sync(smmu_domain);
> + arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> + }
Why do you need them around the map/unmap calls as well?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-21 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 11:24 [RESEND PATCH v17 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-11-21 17:37 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-11-22 12:02 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 18:36 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-26 6:03 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 11:26 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 19:31 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-11-21 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-23 9:13 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 9:22 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-11-23 9:36 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 18:34 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-26 4:02 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-11-26 10:55 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 14:41 ` Thor Thayer
2018-11-26 17:55 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181121173757.GA9801@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox