From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2803C04EBB for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 03:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893C420684 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 03:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KP6/kP37" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 893C420684 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404491AbeKVOOz (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:14:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56448 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404467AbeKVOOy (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:14:54 -0500 Received: from jouet.infradead.org (unknown [179.97.41.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3497208E3; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 03:37:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1542857848; bh=4Q+li0vqynPBxRO06FPM9e6ucn3M9wPlCVazroU1G7E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KP6/kP37zKjMa9ASYCQX4dbtVVQXz/Mg3Y6YnUunFQmmR44s8BB1xmASpkk5v2ePk J+cOnJsyQ3JIgjdR7WmP2dYJgM64WsztH2rM8uJhYzvsokCqeJiPTSG3QocgtwGNBi qFRfY1wfKKeiKRvpFcyan2llZAbIMaf1r21jE0LY= From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 22/28] perf pmu: Suppress potential format-truncation warning Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:36:05 -0300 Message-Id: <20181122033611.15890-23-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.5 In-Reply-To: <20181122033611.15890-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20181122033611.15890-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Hutchings Depending on which functions are inlined in util/pmu.c, the snprintf() calls in perf_pmu__parse_{scale,unit,per_pkg,snapshot}() might trigger a warning: util/pmu.c: In function 'pmu_aliases': util/pmu.c:178:31: error: '%s' directive output may be truncated writing up to 255 bytes into a region of size between 0 and 4095 [-Werror=format-truncation=] snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.unit", dir, name); ^~ I found this when trying to build perf from Linux 3.16 with gcc 8. However I can reproduce the problem in mainline if I force __perf_pmu__new_alias() to be inlined. Suppress this by using scnprintf() as has been done elsewhere in perf. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181111184524.fux4taownc6ndbx6@decadent.org.uk Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c index 7e49baad304d..7348eea0248f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int perf_pmu__parse_scale(struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, char *dir, char * int fd, ret = -1; char path[PATH_MAX]; - snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.scale", dir, name); + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.scale", dir, name); fd = open(path, O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int perf_pmu__parse_unit(struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, char *dir, char *n ssize_t sret; int fd; - snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.unit", dir, name); + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.unit", dir, name); fd = open(path, O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ perf_pmu__parse_per_pkg(struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, char *dir, char *name) char path[PATH_MAX]; int fd; - snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.per-pkg", dir, name); + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.per-pkg", dir, name); fd = open(path, O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int perf_pmu__parse_snapshot(struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, char path[PATH_MAX]; int fd; - snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.snapshot", dir, name); + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s.snapshot", dir, name); fd = open(path, O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) -- 2.14.5