From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:38:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181122193837.GA3320@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181122162708.GH28270@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:27:09PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 11/22, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > >
> > > Commit 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() +
> > > register() race") added the UPROBE_COPY_INSN flag, and corresponding
> > > smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() memory barriers, to ensure that handle_swbp()
> > > uses fully-initialized uprobes only.
> > >
> > > However, the smp_rmb() is mis-placed: this barrier should be placed
> > > after handle_swbp() has tested for the flag, thus guaranteeing that
> > > (program-order) subsequent loads from the uprobe can see the initial
> > > stores performed by prepare_uprobe().
> > >
> > > Move the smp_rmb() accordingly. Also amend the comments associated
> > > to the two memory barriers to indicate their actual locations.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> > > Fixes: 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race")
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Thanks, Oleg.
>
> Yes, but I am not sure this is the -stable material...
I'm inclined to leave it to you/the maintainers in question to decide
about this, ;-) but please let me know if a resend or another action
is needed from me.
Andrea
>
> Oleg.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-22 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-22 16:10 [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more Andrea Parri
2018-11-22 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-22 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-22 19:38 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2018-11-23 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-23 7:33 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181122193837.GA3320@andrea \
--to=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox