Re: [PATCH] perf symbols: Cannot disassemble some routines when debuginfo present

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

Em Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:24:21AM -0800, Eric Saint Etienne wrote:
> > > > +		/*
> > > > +		 * When using -ffunction-sections, only .text gets loaded by
> > > > +		 * map_groups__find() into al->map. Consequently al->map address
> > > > +		 * range encompass the whole code.
> > > > +		 *
> > > > +		 * But map__load() has just loaded many function maps by
> > > > +		 * splitting al->map, which reduced al->map range drastically.
> > > > +		 * Very likely the target address is now in one of those newly
> > > > +		 * created function maps, so we need to lookup the map again
> > > > +		 * to find that new map.
> > > > +		 */
> > > 
> > > hum, so map__load actualy can split the map to create new maps?
> > > 
> > > cold you please point me to that code? I haven't touch this area for some
> > > time and I can't find it
> > 
> > The split happens in dso_process_kernel_symbol() in symbol-elf.c where we
> > call map_groups__find_by_name() to find an existing map, but with
> > -ffunction-sections and a symbol belonging to new (function) map, such map
> > doesn't exist yet so we end up creating one and adjusting existing maps
> > accordingly because adjust_kernel_syms is set. Makes sense?
> > 
> > As of 4.20-rc3 the call chain is as follows:
> > event:c:1573	   map__load()
> > map.c:315	   dso__load()
> > symobl.c:1528	   dso__load_kernel_sym()
> > symbol.c:1896	   dso__load_vmlinux_path()
> > 		   (or we directly call dso__load_vmlinux() at line 1892)
> > symbol.c:1744	   dso__load_vmlinux()
> > symbol.c:1719	   dso__load_sym()
> > symbol-elf.c:1090  dso_process_kernel_symbol()
> 
> i see, thank for the pointers.. could you please mention
> this in your comment and changelog as well?
> 
> also to document in the code that it's related to map__load
> could you put it to the if contidion, like:
> 
> +               if (load_map && (al->addr < al->map->start || al->addr >= al->map->end))
> 

Eric, please address Jiri's comments and send a v2, ok?

- Arnaldo