From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Fix error with config term pt=0
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:09:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128130942.GC31608@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7c5b4e5-9497-10e5-fd43-5f3e4a0fe51d@intel.com>
Em Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 02:38:13PM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 27/11/18 2:39 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:43:36AM +0200, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >> Users should never use 'pt=0', but if they do it may give a meaningless
> >> error:
> >>
> >> $ perf record -e intel_pt/pt=0/u uname
> >> Error:
> >> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for
> >> event (intel_pt/pt=0/u).
> >>
> >> Fix that by forcing 'pt=1'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c | 8 ++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
> >> index db0ba8caf5a2..af25a7824ee0 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
> >> @@ -524,10 +524,18 @@ static int intel_pt_validate_config(struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu,
> >> struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> >> {
> >> int err;
> >> + char c;
> >>
> >> if (!evsel)
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * If supported, force pass-through config term (pt=1) even if user
> >> + * sets pt=0, which avoids senseless kernel errors.
> >> + */
> >> + if (perf_pmu__scan_file(intel_pt_pmu, "format/pt", "%c", &c) == 1)
> >> + evsel->attr.config |= 1;
> >
> > shouldn't we have a warning like:
> >
> > pr_warning("pt=0 doesn't make sense, forcing pt=1")
> >
> >
> > Instead of silently doing something the user, mistakenly, did
> > explicitely?
>
> Sure, here it is:
Thanks, sticked this to the cset:
------------------------
Committer testing:
# perf record -e intel_pt/pt=0/u uname
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (intel_pt/pt=0/u).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
# perf record -e intel_pt/pt=0/u uname
pt=0 doesn't make sense, forcing pt=1
Linux
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.020 MB perf.data ]
#
------------------------
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-27 8:43 [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Fix error with config term pt=0 Adrian Hunter
2018-11-27 12:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-11-28 12:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-11-28 13:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-12-14 20:27 ` [tip:perf/core] perf intel-pt: Fix error with config term "pt=0" tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2018-12-18 13:54 ` tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181128130942.GC31608@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox