Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus

Alex Williamson
2018-11-30T16:19:34Z

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:24:16 +0000
Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 11:26 AM
> > To: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>; Bjorn Helgaas
> > <helgaas@kernel.org>; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; bharatb.yadav@gmail.com; David Daney
> > <david.daney@cavium.com>; jglauber@cavium.com;
> > mbroemme@libmpq.org; chrisrblake93@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 05:29:47 +0000
> > Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:46 AM
> > > > To: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>
> > > > Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com; Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>;
> > > > linux- pci@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> > > > kernel@vger.kernel.org>; bharatb.yadav@gmail.com; David Daney
> > > > <david.daney@cavium.com>; jglauber@cavium.com;
> > mbroemme@libmpq.org;
> > > > chrisrblake93@gmail.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:32 PM Bharat Bhushan
> > > > <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:39 PM
> > > > > > To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>;
> > > > > > linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > > bharatb.yadav@gmail.com; David Daney
> > <david.daney@cavium.com>;
> > > > Jan
> > > > > > Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com>; Maik Broemme
> > > > <mbroemme@libmpq.org>;
> > > > > > Chris Blake <chrisrblake93@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark NXP LS1088 to avoid bus reset bus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:33:56 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas
> > > > > > <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > 4) Is there a hardware erratum for this? If so, please
> > > > > > > include the URL here.
> > > > >
> > > > > No h/w errata as of now.
> > > >
> > > > Does that mean (a) the HW folks agree this is a hardware problem but
> > > > they haven't written an erratum, (b) there is an erratum but it
> > > > isn't public, (c) we don't have any concrete evidence of a hardware
> > > > problem, but things just don't work if we do a bus reset, (d) something
> > else?
> > >
> > > I will say it is (c) - not concluded to be hardware h/w issue.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > In pci_reset_secondary_bus() I have tried to increase the delay
> > > > > after reset
> > > > but not helped.
> > > > > Do I need to add delay at some other place as well?
> > > >
> > > > No, I think the place you tried should be enough.
> > > >
> > > > You should also be able to exercise this from user-space by using
> > > > "setpci" to set and clear the Secondary Bus Reset bit in the Bridge
> > > > Control register. Then you can also use setpci to read/write config
> > > > space of the NIC. The kernel would normally read the Vendor and
> > > > Device IDs as the first access to the device during enumeration.
> > > > You also might be able to learn something by using "lspci -vv" on
> > > > the bridge before and after the reset to see if it logs any AER bits (if it
> > supports AER) or the other standard error logging bits.
> > >
> > > I tried below sequence for Secondary bus reset and device config space
> > > show 0xff
> > >
> > > root@localhost:~# lspci -x
> > > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Freescale Semiconductor Inc Device 80c0 (rev
> > > 10)
> > > 00: 57 19 c0 80 07 01 10 00 10 00 04 06 08 00 01 00
> > > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 01 01 00 00
> > > 20: 00 40 00 40 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 63 01 00 00
> > >
> > > 0002:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit
> > > Network Connection
> > > 00: 86 80 d3 10 06 04 10 00 00 00 00 02 10 00 00 00
> > > 10: 00 00 0c 40 00 00 00 40 01 00 00 00 00 00 0e 40
> > > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 86 80 1f a0
> > > 30: 00 00 24 40 c8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 63 01 00 00
> > >
> > > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x40
> > > root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x00
> > >
> > > root@localhost:~# lspci -x
> > > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Freescale Semiconductor Inc Device 80c0 (rev
> > > 10)
> > > 00: 57 19 c0 80 07 01 10 00 10 00 04 06 08 00 01 00
> > > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 01 01 00 00
> > > 20: 00 40 00 40 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 63 01 00 00
> >
> > Just for curiosity sake, what if you re-write the secondary and subordinate
> > bus registers here:
> >
> > # setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x19.b=0x01
> > # setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x1a.b=0xff
>
> Result is same, here are logs
>
> root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x40
> root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x3e.b=0x00
> root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x19.b=0x01
> root@localhost:~# setpci -s 0002:00:00.0 0x1a.b=0xff
> root@localhost:~# lspci -x
> 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Freescale Semiconductor Inc Device 80c0 (rev 10)
> 00: 57 19 c0 80 07 01 10 00 10 00 04 06 08 00 01 00
> 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 01 01 00 00
> 20: 00 40 00 40 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 63 01 00 00
>
> 0002:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection (rev ff)
> 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 20: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff

Ok, thanks for scratching my itch.

> > IIRC the users that debugged the AMD bus reset issue re-wrote the entire 64
> > bytes of the bridge config header and then further narrowed the issue down
> > to the two registers above. If one bridge implementation can have such an
> > issue, maybe others do too. Perhaps there's common IP in use.
>
> > Are you able
> > to test other endpoints besides this e1000e device with this setpci
> > technique? Thanks,
>
> I tried with " Broadcom Limited NetXtreme BCM5722 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express" I observe same issue.

Personally I'd exhaust talking with your hardware folks before blocking
bus resets at the software level, it seems like a gap in PCIe
compliance of the device. Thanks,

Alex