From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DBCC04EB8 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103E32146D for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZtSTLG0+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 103E32146D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727269AbeLAFiE (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 00:38:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55974 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726640AbeLAFiE (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 00:38:04 -0500 Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [179.97.41.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 213B72147C; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:27:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1543602474; bh=7Dfvf8OSumGKynj02xRd9+I+HPwdwyMXwk/Re70zhDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZtSTLG0+sH0Gt1Cddmy22LxLAnmmalRQV9BTKajuGP2XENxh26L2oCJhymRdG15Gs +lW4UIy1OwT9uS9rpn6BUqO9Z0haCeG5GtPs8XQ0LsBfCToc49ChSZHEMBj20oPF2+ EkjOntxxurTREQWJyDNUh/OGxFpZyL4r+fiODvKk= From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 16/22] perf intel-pt: Fix error with config term "pt=0" Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:26:46 -0300 Message-Id: <20181130182652.23620-17-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.2 In-Reply-To: <20181130182652.23620-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20181130182652.23620-1-acme@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Adrian Hunter Users should never use 'pt=0', but if they do it may give a meaningless error: $ perf record -e intel_pt/pt=0/u uname Error: The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (intel_pt/pt=0/u). Fix that by forcing 'pt=1'. Committer testing: # perf record -e intel_pt/pt=0/u uname Error: The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (intel_pt/pt=0/u). /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information. # perf record -e intel_pt/pt=0/u uname pt=0 doesn't make sense, forcing pt=1 Linux [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.020 MB perf.data ] # Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b7c5b4e5-9497-10e5-fd43-5f3e4a0fe51d@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c index db0ba8caf5a2..ba8ecaf52200 100644 --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c @@ -524,10 +524,21 @@ static int intel_pt_validate_config(struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu, struct perf_evsel *evsel) { int err; + char c; if (!evsel) return 0; + /* + * If supported, force pass-through config term (pt=1) even if user + * sets pt=0, which avoids senseless kernel errors. + */ + if (perf_pmu__scan_file(intel_pt_pmu, "format/pt", "%c", &c) == 1 && + !(evsel->attr.config & 1)) { + pr_warning("pt=0 doesn't make sense, forcing pt=1\n"); + evsel->attr.config |= 1; + } + err = intel_pt_val_config_term(intel_pt_pmu, "caps/cycle_thresholds", "cyc_thresh", "caps/psb_cyc", evsel->attr.config); -- 2.19.1