From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED85C04EB8 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0081120868 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mWpTCLWr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0081120868 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726590AbeLAGgF (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 01:36:05 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59554 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725790AbeLAGgF (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 01:36:05 -0500 Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [179.97.41.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7204F20868; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:25:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1543605946; bh=pZP9k70lbrleRft8mNWFS9MFlZPIdx0DrrwWsqpW5Nk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mWpTCLWrX1ciINSOoUqG/dkUArGYTgPAVu3VieugEyybgWBl1IKCrNWGoXJTl91w8 OWmFQuJpjvfeTOlQjdmgKGdXINNJMLna/PqmuwZ3IqfOhZHRTr/dsurjqHTAZpIsC9 mJnMtaWs8HjN8O2z9JndS+i6/gtPHaYAMOmkEDTQ= Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CFBA40BF1; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:25:44 -0300 (-03) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:25:44 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jin Yao Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf report/annotate: Support average IPC and IPC coverage for function Message-ID: <20181130192544.GD19230@kernel.org> References: <1543586097-27632-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1543586097-27632-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:54:53PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu: > Add supporting of displaying the average IPC and IPC coverage > percentage per function. > v5: > --- > Update documentation according to Ingo's comments. > > Only the patch "perf report: Documentation average IPC and > IPC coverage" is changed. Others are not changed. Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo