From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>,
SuraveeSuthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: AMD EPYC Topology problems
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:13:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203111359.GA31670@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7369db0c-4917-0807-eef4-cba5e5ae0d4e@citrix.com>
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:23:05PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have dual socket server with the following processor:
>
> [root@xrtmia-09-01 ~]# head /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family : 23
> model : 1
> model name : AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core Processor
> stepping : 2
>
> Which has highlighted a issue in the topology derivation logic.
> (Actually, it was discovered with Xen, but we share the same topology
> infrastructure and the issue is also present with Linux).
>
> There are a total of 64 threads in the system, made of two 32-thread
> sockets. The APIC IDs for this system are sparse - they are 0x0-0x3,
> 0x8-0xb, 0x10-0x13 etc, all the way up to 0x7b.
>
> This is because the socket is made of 4 nodes with 4 cores each, but
> space has been left in the layout for the maximum possible number of
> APIC IDs.
>
> In particular, CPUID 0x80000008:ecx reports 0x0000601f. That is, an
> APIC ID shift of 6 (reporting a maximum of 64 threads per socket), and
> NC as 31 (reporting 32 threads per socket in the current configuration).
>
> c->x86_max_cores is derived from NC and shifted once to exclude threads,
> giving it a final value of 16 cores per socket.
So far so good.
> Given the sparseness of the APIC IDs, it is unsafe to allocate an array
Do we do this somewhere or is this a hypothetical thing?
> of c->x86_max_cores entries, then index it with c->cpu_core_id, as half
> the cores in the system have a cpu_core_id greater than x86_max_cores.
You lost me here. ->cpu_core_id comes from CPUID_Fn8000001E_EBX[7:0].
Are you saying, those core IDs on your box are sparse like the APIC IDs
you mention above?
> There is no logical core ID derived during boot which might be a safe to
> use as an index.
>
> Furthermore, the documentation indicates that these values are expected
> to be per-package, while they are all actually per-socket (with up to 4
> nodes per socket) in the EPYC case.
From Documentation/x86/topology.txt:
"
- cpuinfo_x86.x86_max_cores:
The number of cores in a package. This information is retrieved via CPUID."
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7369db0c-4917-0807-eef4-cba5e5ae0d4e@citrix.com>
2018-12-03 11:13 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-12-03 11:23 ` AMD EPYC Topology problems Andrew Cooper
2018-12-09 12:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-10 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203111359.GA31670@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=brian.woods@amd.com \
--cc=brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox