The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>,
	SuraveeSuthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: AMD EPYC Topology problems
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:13:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203111359.GA31670@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7369db0c-4917-0807-eef4-cba5e5ae0d4e@citrix.com>

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:23:05PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have dual socket server with the following processor:
> 
> [root@xrtmia-09-01 ~]# head /proc/cpuinfo 
> processor	: 0
> vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
> cpu family	: 23
> model		: 1
> model name	: AMD EPYC 7281 16-Core Processor
> stepping	: 2
> 
> Which has highlighted a issue in the topology derivation logic. 
> (Actually, it was discovered with Xen, but we share the same topology
> infrastructure and the issue is also present with Linux).
> 
> There are a total of 64 threads in the system, made of two 32-thread
> sockets.  The APIC IDs for this system are sparse - they are 0x0-0x3,
> 0x8-0xb, 0x10-0x13 etc, all the way up to 0x7b.
> 
> This is because the socket is made of 4 nodes with 4 cores each, but
> space has been left in the layout for the maximum possible number of
> APIC IDs.
> 
> In particular, CPUID 0x80000008:ecx reports 0x0000601f.  That is, an
> APIC ID shift of 6 (reporting a maximum of 64 threads per socket), and
> NC as 31 (reporting 32 threads per socket in the current configuration).
> 
> c->x86_max_cores is derived from NC and shifted once to exclude threads,
> giving it a final value of 16 cores per socket.

So far so good.

> Given the sparseness of the APIC IDs, it is unsafe to allocate an array

Do we do this somewhere or is this a hypothetical thing?

> of c->x86_max_cores entries, then index it with c->cpu_core_id, as half
> the cores in the system have a cpu_core_id greater than x86_max_cores. 

You lost me here. ->cpu_core_id comes from CPUID_Fn8000001E_EBX[7:0].
Are you saying, those core IDs on your box are sparse like the APIC IDs
you mention above?

> There is no logical core ID derived during boot which might be a safe to
> use as an index.
> 
> Furthermore, the documentation indicates that these values are expected
> to be per-package, while they are all actually per-socket (with up to 4
> nodes per socket) in the EPYC case.

From Documentation/x86/topology.txt:
"
  - cpuinfo_x86.x86_max_cores:

    The number of cores in a package. This information is retrieved via CPUID."

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

       reply	other threads:[~2018-12-03 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <7369db0c-4917-0807-eef4-cba5e5ae0d4e@citrix.com>
2018-12-03 11:13 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-12-03 11:23   ` AMD EPYC Topology problems Andrew Cooper
2018-12-09 12:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-10 21:52       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181203111359.GA31670@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=brian.woods@amd.com \
    --cc=brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox