From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFD5C04EB8 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104A92151B for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="E9pDvAhB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 104A92151B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727113AbeLDLCZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 06:02:25 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48306 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727063AbeLDLCU (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 06:02:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78D1E214E0; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:02:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1543921340; bh=OACRTtEG7kXbrTL16o1902E9nXQtCWxlyjzHLwZyQjs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=E9pDvAhBadENZzjDHuO3N/bMMU5JMTw8Gki8B1i0LgbMPvytVcoa7h9K2pLaIRPN+ 66aMii0NwTom9EnEAopeoTeVz1u3iBhN+5zfSiN/dInvUiANpUImbx1yDoiY9mSZSO QcvsdWIitXTvOvCag3PuvLR7ZtRlEpDSBBvHDVDg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo , David Sterba , Ben Hutchings , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 034/146] btrfs: tree-checker: Enhance btrfs_check_node output Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:48:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20181204103728.238824768@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.2 In-Reply-To: <20181204103726.750894136@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181204103726.750894136@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ commit bba4f29896c986c4cec17bc0f19f2ce644fceae1 upstream. Use inline function to replace macro since we don't need stringification. (Macro still exists until all callers get updated) And add more info about the error, and replace EIO with EUCLEAN. For nr_items error, report if it's too large or too small, and output the valid value range. For node block pointer, added a new alignment checker. For key order, also output the next key to make the problem more obvious. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo [ wording adjustments, unindented long strings ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c index 56e25a630103..5acdf3355a3f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c @@ -37,6 +37,46 @@ btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node", \ reason, btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->objectid, slot) +/* + * Error message should follow the following format: + * corrupt : , [, ] + * + * @type: leaf or node + * @identifier: the necessary info to locate the leaf/node. + * It's recommened to decode key.objecitd/offset if it's + * meaningful. + * @reason: describe the error + * @bad_value: optional, it's recommened to output bad value and its + * expected value (range). + * + * Since comma is used to separate the components, only space is allowed + * inside each component. + */ + +/* + * Append generic "corrupt leaf/node root=%llu block=%llu slot=%d: " to @fmt. + * Allows callers to customize the output. + */ +__printf(4, 5) +static void generic_err(const struct btrfs_root *root, + const struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot, + const char *fmt, ...) +{ + struct va_format vaf; + va_list args; + + va_start(args, fmt); + + vaf.fmt = fmt; + vaf.va = &args; + + btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, + "corrupt %s: root=%llu block=%llu slot=%d, %pV", + btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0 ? "leaf" : "node", + root->objectid, btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), slot, &vaf); + va_end(args); +} + static int check_extent_data_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key, int slot) @@ -282,9 +322,11 @@ int btrfs_check_node(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *node) if (nr == 0 || nr > BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root->fs_info)) { btrfs_crit(root->fs_info, - "corrupt node: block %llu root %llu nritems %lu", - node->start, root->objectid, nr); - return -EIO; +"corrupt node: root=%llu block=%llu, nritems too %s, have %lu expect range [1,%u]", + root->objectid, node->start, + nr == 0 ? "small" : "large", nr, + BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root->fs_info)); + return -EUCLEAN; } for (slot = 0; slot < nr - 1; slot++) { @@ -293,14 +335,26 @@ int btrfs_check_node(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *node) btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(node, &next_key, slot + 1); if (!bytenr) { - CORRUPT("invalid item slot", node, root, slot); - ret = -EIO; + generic_err(root, node, slot, + "invalid NULL node pointer"); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + goto out; + } + if (!IS_ALIGNED(bytenr, root->fs_info->sectorsize)) { + generic_err(root, node, slot, + "unaligned pointer, have %llu should be aligned to %u", + bytenr, root->fs_info->sectorsize); + ret = -EUCLEAN; goto out; } if (btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(&key, &next_key) >= 0) { - CORRUPT("bad key order", node, root, slot); - ret = -EIO; + generic_err(root, node, slot, + "bad key order, current (%llu %u %llu) next (%llu %u %llu)", + key.objectid, key.type, key.offset, + next_key.objectid, next_key.type, + next_key.offset); + ret = -EUCLEAN; goto out; } } -- 2.17.1