From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=bZ9D=OO=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED909C04EB8
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  5 Dec 2018 01:16:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418F20850
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed,  5 Dec 2018 01:16:06 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tf44rfrB"
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B418F20850
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726911AbeLEBQF (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:16:05 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37696 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725979AbeLEBQF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:16:05 -0500
Received: from dragon (61-216-91-114.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.216.91.114])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46EC220834;
        Wed,  5 Dec 2018 01:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=default; t=1543972564;
        bh=lByJGk82oohRj4/bN9/42+06EoEpV7mflIBNykS1fgI=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=tf44rfrB1zylAv4eShk2rmJIKrQNiTdLrcq7f2x2ir9SL2RjO1kFP0rRpEZ/CqS2D
         4PmU2B2KPpAnwr0O9IL/0Hiqmuix/V5wMuKLST6wIvzr5+QN56r8O1jroVQXAaYGJ3
         F1GjVdbA5AN5hpRZGIoIzEBP7WTtBqc0hXj6GuKk=
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:15:26 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To:     Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: ls1021a: add nodes for PWMs
Message-ID: <20181205011524.GC3987@dragon>
References: <20181127140944.31018-1-patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181127140944.31018-1-patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:09:44PM +0100, Patrick Havelange wrote:
> The LS1021A has 8 possible PWMs, so adding them (disabled by default)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>

Applied, thanks.