From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
dave.martin@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
vladimir.murzin@arm.com, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:02:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205150252.GB16171@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543598286-2663-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:18:00PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> We have two entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE capability :
>
> 1) ARM Errata 826319, 827319, 824069, 819472 on A53 r0p[012]
> 2) ARM Errata 819472 on A53 r0p[01]
>
> Both have the same work around. Merge these entries to avoid
> duplicate entries for a single capability. Add a new Kconfig
> entry to control the "capability" entry to make it easier
> to handle combinations of the CONFIGs.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 787d785..ad69e15 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -313,9 +313,13 @@ menu "Kernel Features"
>
> menu "ARM errata workarounds via the alternatives framework"
>
> +config ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
> + def_bool n
> +
> config ARM64_ERRATUM_826319
> bool "Cortex-A53: 826319: System might deadlock if a write cannot complete until read data is accepted"
> default y
> + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
> help
> This option adds an alternative code sequence to work around ARM
> erratum 826319 on Cortex-A53 parts up to r0p2 with an AMBA 4 ACE or
> @@ -337,6 +341,7 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_826319
> config ARM64_ERRATUM_827319
> bool "Cortex-A53: 827319: Data cache clean instructions might cause overlapping transactions to the interconnect"
> default y
> + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
> help
> This option adds an alternative code sequence to work around ARM
> erratum 827319 on Cortex-A53 parts up to r0p2 with an AMBA 5 CHI
> @@ -358,6 +363,7 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_827319
> config ARM64_ERRATUM_824069
> bool "Cortex-A53: 824069: Cache line might not be marked as clean after a CleanShared snoop"
> default y
> + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
> help
> This option adds an alternative code sequence to work around ARM
> erratum 824069 on Cortex-A53 parts up to r0p2 when it is connected
> @@ -380,6 +386,7 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_824069
> config ARM64_ERRATUM_819472
> bool "Cortex-A53: 819472: Store exclusive instructions might cause data corruption"
> default y
> + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
> help
> This option adds an alternative code sequence to work around ARM
> erratum 819472 on Cortex-A53 parts up to r0p1 with an L2 cache
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> index 12f93e4d..2e26375 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct midr_range {
> .rv_max = MIDR_CPU_VAR_REV(v_max, r_max), \
> }
>
> +#define MIDR_REV_RANGE(m, v, r_min, r_max) MIDR_RANGE(m, v, r_min, v, r_max)
What's the point of this macro?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-30 17:17 [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: capabilities: Optimize checking and enabling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-05 15:02 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-12-05 17:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-06 9:58 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge duplicate Cavium erratum entries Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge duplicate entries for Qualcomm erratum 1003 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: capabilities: Speed up capability lookup Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: capabilities: Optimize this_cpu_has_cap Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: capabilities: Use linear array for detection and verification Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: capabilities: Batch cpu_enable callbacks Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181205150252.GB16171@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox