From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D537C04EB9 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFBB20878 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:50:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4BFBB20878 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728265AbeLEPuO (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:50:14 -0500 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:51918 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727297AbeLEPuN (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:50:13 -0500 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5B907345; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:50:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:50:12 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Lu Baolu Cc: "Liu, Yi L" , David Woodhouse , "Raj, Ashok" , "Kumar, Sanjay K" , "Pan, Jacob jun" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Sun, Yi Y" , "peterx@redhat.com" , Jean-Philippe Brucker , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jacob Pan Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Manage scalalble mode PASID tables Message-ID: <20181205155012.GC16835@8bytes.org> References: <20181128035449.10226-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20181128035449.10226-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20181203134411.lejlkbnagxml54ro@8bytes.org> <5c81008b-30e8-177d-0182-db366608562f@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c81008b-30e8-177d-0182-db366608562f@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:58:06PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > This function is called in an unsleepable context. > > spin_lock(&lock) > [...] > if (pasid_table_is_necessary) > allocate_pasid_table(dev) > [...] > spin_unlock(&lock) > > We can move it out of the lock range. > > How about > > if (pasid_table_is_necessary) > pasid_table = allocate_pasid_table(dev) > > spin_lock(&lock) > [...] > if (pasid_table_is_necessary) > set_up_pasid_table(pasid_table) > [...] > spin_unlock(&lock) Hmm, so when the IOMMU is configured in scalable mode we can just allocate a pasid-table for the device when we set it up, right? Scalable mode is a boot-time decision, so we know for sure whether we need a pasid-table on device-setup time. And the device-setup code it preemptable, so I think it this allocation should be outside of any spin-locked section. Joerg