public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 23:46:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205234649.ssvmv4ulwevgdla4@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203110237.14787-1-rpenyaev@suse.de>

Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which
> can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events
> rates and many fds per epoll.  Problem can be very well reproduced by
> generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while
> consumer thread does polling.  In other words this patch increases the
> bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by
> adding poll items in a lockless way to the list.

Hi Roman,

I also tried to solve this problem many years ago with help of
the well-tested-in-userspace wfcqueue from Mathieu's URCU.

I was also looking to solve contention with parallel epoll_wait
callers with this.  AFAIK, it worked well; but needed the
userspace tests from wfcqueue ported over to the kernel and more
review.

I didn't have enough computing power to show the real-world
benefits or funding to continue:

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=wfcqueue+d:..20130501

It might not be too much trouble for you to brush up the wait-free
patches and test them against the rwlock implementation.

(I only noticed this thread since I was catching up on some
 public-inbox work :>)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-05 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-03 11:02 [RFC PATCH 1/1] epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention Roman Penyaev
2018-12-03 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-04 11:50   ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-04 23:59     ` Andrea Parri
2018-12-05 11:25       ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-04 17:23 ` Jason Baron
2018-12-04 19:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-12-05 11:22     ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-05 11:16   ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-05 16:38     ` Jason Baron
2018-12-05 20:11       ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-06  1:54   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-06  3:08   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-06 10:27     ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-06  4:04   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-12-06 10:25     ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-05 23:46 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2018-12-06 10:52   ` Roman Penyaev
2018-12-06 20:35     ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181205234649.ssvmv4ulwevgdla4@dcvr \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rpenyaev@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox