From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EDCC04EB9 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF3C2082B for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:43:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544107390; bh=GT8eUTgPlmjae8+b0Z7W7DdRuHN+dC0m+h/iG2ZW4E0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=K5Wsvpjmhw2ydqIYx+XuLhyY6YmI/4228jDpgoGMYmHRvesinCBrdYWPGmdRQT/iC uWbMzjX2hRpSMRldq/oXQB+LY3adDHqu2t6YtwmL2RJ1LJX4yjmMyqMvRjS9T0mddf YL4E/q9UW/XrckbZ0hQv1WzbsPG0jTl50EkpQBz8= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFF3C2082B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730622AbeLFOnJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:43:09 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47496 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729968AbeLFOnF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:43:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEBB22146D; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:43:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544107384; bh=GT8eUTgPlmjae8+b0Z7W7DdRuHN+dC0m+h/iG2ZW4E0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UueUd+hGP7tSvf/WNfKuzy0hTt5gSKs1jMWyzxrOgxc7vLS0oFWxb+rRiDOobve/p 9050DExnU9ZjiyVxfRg8q09VtK5cRiV1Qmo3ExWUJo3bygpZxTzgnTB9wutBRs/yms SjRstUvs/q/w82VFjMfgd/3eAiUq3cKLiFWjwtH4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo , Nikolay Borisov , David Sterba Subject: [PATCH 4.14 41/55] btrfs: Always try all copies when reading extent buffers Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:39:15 +0100 Message-Id: <20181206143003.943621097@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.2 In-Reply-To: <20181206143001.749982936@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181206143001.749982936@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Nikolay Borisov commit f8397d69daef06d358430d3054662fb597e37c00 upstream. When a metadata read is served the endio routine btree_readpage_end_io_hook is called which eventually runs the tree-checker. If tree-checker fails to validate the read eb then it sets EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This leads to btree_read_extent_buffer_pages wrongly assuming that all available copies of this extent buffer are wrong and failing prematurely. Fix this modify btree_read_extent_buffer_pages to read all copies of the data. This failure was exhibitted in xfstests btrfs/124 which would spuriously fail its balance operations. The reason was that when balance was run following re-introduction of the missing raid1 disk __btrfs_map_block would map the read request to stripe 0, which corresponded to devid 2 (the disk which is being removed in the test): item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 3553624064) itemoff 15975 itemsize 112 length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID1 io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096 num_stripes 2 sub_stripes 1 stripe 0 devid 2 offset 2156920832 dev_uuid 8466c350-ed0c-4c3b-b17d-6379b445d5c8 stripe 1 devid 1 offset 3553624064 dev_uuid 1265d8db-5596-477e-af03-df08eb38d2ca This caused read requests for a checksum item that to be routed to the stale disk which triggered the aforementioned logic involving EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This then triggered cascading failures of the balance operation. Fixes: a826d6dcb32d ("Btrfs: check items for correctness as we search") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -451,9 +451,9 @@ static int btree_read_extent_buffer_page int mirror_num = 0; int failed_mirror = 0; - clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT, &eb->bflags); io_tree = &BTRFS_I(fs_info->btree_inode)->io_tree; while (1) { + clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT, &eb->bflags); ret = read_extent_buffer_pages(io_tree, eb, WAIT_COMPLETE, btree_get_extent, mirror_num); if (!ret) { @@ -464,14 +464,6 @@ static int btree_read_extent_buffer_page ret = -EIO; } - /* - * This buffer's crc is fine, but its contents are corrupted, so - * there is no reason to read the other copies, they won't be - * any less wrong. - */ - if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT, &eb->bflags)) - break; - num_copies = btrfs_num_copies(fs_info, eb->start, eb->len); if (num_copies == 1)