[PATCH 4.14 27/55] userfaultfd: shmem/hugetlbfs: only allow to register VM_MAYWRITE vmas

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-06T14:57:53Z

From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>

commit 29ec90660d68bbdd69507c1c8b4e33aa299278b1 upstream.

After the VMA to register the uffd onto is found, check that it has
VM_MAYWRITE set before allowing registration. This way we inherit all
common code checks before allowing to fill file holes in shmem and
hugetlbfs with UFFDIO_COPY.

The userfaultfd memory model is not applicable for readonly files unless
it's a MAP_PRIVATE.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181126173452.26955-4-aarcange@redhat.com
Fixes: ff62a3421044 ("hugetlb: implement memfd sealing")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Fixes: 4c27fe4c4c84 ("userfaultfd: shmem: add shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte for userfaultfd support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
mm/userfaultfd.c | 15 ++++++---------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1362,6 +1362,19 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct u
ret = -EINVAL;
if (!vma_can_userfault(cur))
goto out_unlock;
+
+ /*
+ * UFFDIO_COPY will fill file holes even without
+ * PROT_WRITE. This check enforces that if this is a
+ * MAP_SHARED, the process has write permission to the backing
+ * file. If VM_MAYWRITE is set it also enforces that on a
+ * MAP_SHARED vma: there is no F_WRITE_SEAL and no further
+ * F_WRITE_SEAL can be taken until the vma is destroyed.
+ */
+ ret = -EPERM;
+ if (unlikely(!(cur->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE)))
+ goto out_unlock;
+
/*
* If this vma contains ending address, and huge pages
* check alignment.
@@ -1407,6 +1420,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct u
BUG_ON(!vma_can_userfault(vma));
BUG_ON(vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx &&
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx != ctx);
+ WARN_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE));

/*
* Nothing to do: this vma is already registered into this
@@ -1553,6 +1567,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct
cond_resched();

BUG_ON(!vma_can_userfault(vma));
+ WARN_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE));

/*
* Nothing to do: this vma is already registered into this
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -228,8 +228,9 @@ retry:
if (!dst_vma || !is_vm_hugetlb_page(dst_vma))
goto out_unlock;
/*
- * Only allow __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb on userfaultfd
- * registered ranges.
+ * Check the vma is registered in uffd, this is
+ * required to enforce the VM_MAYWRITE check done at
+ * uffd registration time.
*/
if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -472,13 +473,9 @@ retry:
if (!dst_vma)
goto out_unlock;
/*
- * Be strict and only allow __mcopy_atomic on userfaultfd
- * registered ranges to prevent userland errors going
- * unnoticed. As far as the VM consistency is concerned, it
- * would be perfectly safe to remove this check, but there's
- * no useful usage for __mcopy_atomic ouside of userfaultfd
- * registered ranges. This is after all why these are ioctls
- * belonging to the userfaultfd and not syscalls.
+ * Check the vma is registered in uffd, this is required to
+ * enforce the VM_MAYWRITE check done at uffd registration
+ * time.
*/
if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx)
goto out_unlock;