public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] iommu: fix amd_iommu=force_isolation
Date: Thu,  6 Dec 2018 14:39:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206213915.196205-1-yuzhao@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204223716.214159-1-yuzhao@google.com>

The parameter is still there but it's ignored. We need to check its
value before deciding to go into passthrough mode for AMD IOMMU v2
capable device.

We occasionally use this parameter to force v2 capable device into
translation mode to debug memory corruption that we suspect is
caused by DMA writes.

To address the following comment from Joerg Roedel on the first
version, v2 capability of device is completely ignored.
> This breaks the iommu_v2 use-case, as it needs a direct mapping for the
> devices that support it.

And from Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt:
  This option does not override iommu=pt

Fixes: aafd8ba0ca74 ("iommu/amd: Implement add_device and remove_device")

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index 1167ff0416cf..325f3bad118b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -438,7 +438,14 @@ static int iommu_init_device(struct device *dev)
 
 	dev_data->alias = get_alias(dev);
 
-	if (dev_is_pci(dev) && pci_iommuv2_capable(to_pci_dev(dev))) {
+	/*
+	 * By default we use passthrough mode for IOMMUv2 capable device.
+	 * But if amd_iommu=force_isolation is set (e.g. to debug DMA to
+	 * invalid address), we ignore the capability for the device so
+	 * it'll be forced to go into translation mode.
+	 */
+	if ((iommu_pass_through || !amd_iommu_force_isolation) &&
+	    dev_is_pci(dev) && pci_iommuv2_capable(to_pci_dev(dev))) {
 		struct amd_iommu *iommu;
 
 		iommu = amd_iommu_rlookup_table[dev_data->devid];
-- 
2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 22:37 [PATCH] iommu: fix amd_iommu=force_isolation Yu Zhao
2018-12-05 16:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-12-05 19:30   ` Yu Zhao
2018-12-06 21:39 ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2018-12-07 13:08   ` [PATCH v2] " Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181206213915.196205-1-yuzhao@google.com \
    --to=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox