From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518AFC65BAF for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126D420892 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:05:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544267140; bh=5wbzCEyxCXKgx7HJSF8HM5pU4xO7wYMTxM5OA7Dntzw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=WqYxd0CgpVUz2dbPHgxhMy5l5POWu9AlIUSKe3V6JX8T6PF+6fe9KVnFSeDH3dt+H Hn3vAJ4NcbF9CBr9ig5XB6TvnqsfxB7WDwYl5rG39bcm3E5uhdsGObHj25vbwbSJ4M L0uT4RW14NjLEzMgxj+VxMGPMFoGomtxVQqXlpfk= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 126D420892 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726177AbeLHLFj (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 06:05:39 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60286 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726111AbeLHLFj (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 06:05:39 -0500 Received: from archlinux (cpc91196-cmbg18-2-0-cust659.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.96.234.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1193920700; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:05:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544267138; bh=5wbzCEyxCXKgx7HJSF8HM5pU4xO7wYMTxM5OA7Dntzw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vFOl9kB7Ym+RDJNxZi1278YwglBOd7cQHT80ONZw7XoLrn7ybjelbuy4knBt6YUnh NOnxIRuAAeRy81UBmmX3ny1gSVZV5ktc7SlUYLlEFpihNVCznnV82DJSnDJboNhO6C XLJzPWptRmLFukKU9RgkDTAcGUqPh774XsbaUtzE= Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:05:33 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Joe Perches Cc: Himanshu Jha , Marcelo Schmitt , Andrew Morton , lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-usp@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: add binding doc for ad5933 Message-ID: <20181208110533.07d66422@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <772d86622aea17e1c7b5ac05e096f1a129fc86b4.camel@perches.com> References: <20181202165712.t6pd6ygq57llf2lr@smtp.gmail.com> <20181202185043.GA2007@himanshu-Vostro-3559> <772d86622aea17e1c7b5ac05e096f1a129fc86b4.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:22:15 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 00:20 +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 02:57:12PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > > > Add a devicetree documentation for the ad5933 and ad5934 impedance > > > converter, network analyzer. > > > > > > Co-Developed-by: Gabriel Capella > > > > checkpatch spits out: > > > > WARNING: Non-standard signature: Co-Developed-by: > > > > Co-developed-by Vs Co-Developed-by ? > > > > Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst: - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:12) When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-Developed-by: > > > > Confusing! Don't know which one is correct. > > I think neither one. > > What's the real purpose or value of it? > There isn't one as far as I can tell. > > Just use Signed-off-by: > > Or maybe add multiple "Authored-by:" if > anyone is all that concerned about authorship > crediting... This is output of pair programming so only fair to acknowledge both developers (or more if a larger group). Right now we have a guide that says Co-developed-by is the way to do that. I would stick to that. If people feel something else makes sense then they should propose a change to the documentation and hopefully we can reach some agreement on this. I'm happy with Co-developed-by in IIO as I think it's a fair reflection of what happened. Authored-by would be fine but isn't a standard tag documented anywhere. Jonathan > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Capella > > > --- > > > > Use `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl ` to list the DT > > maintainers and the relevant mailing list. > > > > >