[PATCH 4.14 42/67] vhost/vsock: fix use-after-free in network stack callers

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-11T16:07:18Z

From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

commit 834e772c8db0c6a275d75315d90aba4ebbb1e249 upstream.

If the network stack calls .send_pkt()/.cancel_pkt() during .release(),
a struct vhost_vsock use-after-free is possible. This occurs because
.release() does not wait for other CPUs to stop using struct
vhost_vsock.

Switch to an RCU-enabled hashtable (indexed by guest CID) so that
.release() can wait for other CPUs by calling synchronize_rcu(). This
also eliminates vhost_vsock_lock acquisition in the data path so it
could have a positive effect on performance.

This is CVE-2018-14625 "kernel: use-after-free Read in vhost_transport_send_pkt".

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+bd391451452fb0b93039@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+e3e074963495f92a89ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d5a0a170c5069658b141@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <linux/virtio_vsock.h>
#include <linux/vhost.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>

#include <net/af_vsock.h>
#include "vhost.h"
@@ -27,14 +28,14 @@ enum {

/* Used to track all the vhost_vsock instances on the system. */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vhost_vsock_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(vhost_vsock_list);
+static DEFINE_READ_MOSTLY_HASHTABLE(vhost_vsock_hash, 8);

struct vhost_vsock {
struct vhost_dev dev;
struct vhost_virtqueue vqs[2];

- /* Link to global vhost_vsock_list, protected by vhost_vsock_lock */
- struct list_head list;
+ /* Link to global vhost_vsock_hash, writes use vhost_vsock_lock */
+ struct hlist_node hash;

struct vhost_work send_pkt_work;
spinlock_t send_pkt_list_lock;
@@ -50,11 +51,14 @@ static u32 vhost_transport_get_local_cid
return VHOST_VSOCK_DEFAULT_HOST_CID;
}

-static struct vhost_vsock *__vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
+/* Callers that dereference the return value must hold vhost_vsock_lock or the
+ * RCU read lock.
+ */
+static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
{
struct vhost_vsock *vsock;

- list_for_each_entry(vsock, &vhost_vsock_list, list) {
+ hash_for_each_possible_rcu(vhost_vsock_hash, vsock, hash, guest_cid) {
u32 other_cid = vsock->guest_cid;

/* Skip instances that have no CID yet */
@@ -69,17 +73,6 @@ static struct vhost_vsock *__vhost_vsock
return NULL;
}

-static struct vhost_vsock *vhost_vsock_get(u32 guest_cid)
-{
- struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
- vsock = __vhost_vsock_get(guest_cid);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
-
- return vsock;
-}
-
static void
vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
@@ -210,9 +203,12 @@ vhost_transport_send_pkt(struct virtio_v
struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
int len = pkt->len;

+ rcu_read_lock();
+
/* Find the vhost_vsock according to guest context id */
vsock = vhost_vsock_get(le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid));
if (!vsock) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -225,6 +221,8 @@ vhost_transport_send_pkt(struct virtio_v
spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);

vhost_work_queue(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return len;
}

@@ -234,12 +232,15 @@ vhost_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_
struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt, *n;
int cnt = 0;
+ int ret = -ENODEV;
LIST_HEAD(freeme);

+ rcu_read_lock();
+
/* Find the vhost_vsock according to guest context id */
vsock = vhost_vsock_get(vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid);
if (!vsock)
- return -ENODEV;
+ goto out;

spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(pkt, n, &vsock->send_pkt_list, list) {
@@ -265,7 +266,10 @@ vhost_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_
vhost_poll_queue(&tx_vq->poll);
}

- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}

static struct virtio_vsock_pkt *
@@ -531,10 +535,6 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct i
spin_lock_init(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock->send_pkt_list);
vhost_work_init(&vsock->send_pkt_work, vhost_transport_send_pkt_work);
-
- spin_lock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
- list_add_tail(&vsock->list, &vhost_vsock_list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
return 0;

out:
@@ -575,9 +575,13 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_release(struc
struct vhost_vsock *vsock = file->private_data;

spin_lock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
- list_del(&vsock->list);
+ if (vsock->guest_cid)
+ hash_del_rcu(&vsock->hash);
spin_unlock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);

+ /* Wait for other CPUs to finish using vsock */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
/* Iterating over all connections for all CIDs to find orphans is
* inefficient. Room for improvement here. */
vsock_for_each_connected_socket(vhost_vsock_reset_orphans);
@@ -618,12 +622,17 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_cid(struct vh

/* Refuse if CID is already in use */
spin_lock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
- other = __vhost_vsock_get(guest_cid);
+ other = vhost_vsock_get(guest_cid);
if (other && other != vsock) {
spin_unlock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);
return -EADDRINUSE;
}
+
+ if (vsock->guest_cid)
+ hash_del_rcu(&vsock->hash);
+
vsock->guest_cid = guest_cid;
+ hash_add_rcu(vhost_vsock_hash, &vsock->hash, guest_cid);
spin_unlock_bh(&vhost_vsock_lock);

return 0;