From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CED8C07E85 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E7D20855 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Ldgt74xp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E5E7D20855 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726784AbeLKSEm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:04:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:39914 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726241AbeLKSEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:04:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id f81so3246369wmd.4; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:04:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GwWUMo6beCgCPrW5yYM3akx4k7A7+JHyKA351TyVZk0=; b=Ldgt74xpxmIV+6JnS6m63rEB2Kb680fv5IIh1Q+vf16i18Fa3lzAL7GT1yUcBnvK2Z 0oiTXe4MwuWc+tZFbGHouGB3QyQcFgOl0Xq6NIYSrjS3Cm1gKRRX352mm5T7HzInjhnV ln0zJZeykB0ZVQaCJmfs9CKqFgu69cR6uh2GG+l2H5fjvGAVjXi9n4CsrnmFcxTxoK8P pG8XzQE2ZzCFOp2MlF1bWTALDdSPLSl9ZqmxBc+tmmycc5kbqe2lF0P5xZD5TM0rUPTw 5DZ8C99m7YNyJxsRAN470+EYKn1DAU/4Fx9pQzQXG8p/X+zi80nayn35VodAlKXIp/Iy bNEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GwWUMo6beCgCPrW5yYM3akx4k7A7+JHyKA351TyVZk0=; b=LXLDnd6toYySHbCVT1xWy8RlOjLLg47xrOizV+tHNpbVl0v6/eCYvwsA9itbvISOBS XB66HWizAI4bGBoxP/wCZsf7gDvoFzvIrZh16JCDpcedXWGilWsdJWcfAa3q5ubdfN5S Tbg92e6grH+sq7mwElFWd2X54T6o0XwPhXuWCHzqtp7ywE0pJB68fUmG9RVa0hWuGH3e rloQvQa3dD43OiJsNgCw1bPsqDhUGPtP3ulgxU8FohzpAb+Fj4uxl4ggu2ccvofcrmzs P41SC/hKcJ3bft9lzqO5vPzVPZtK/XC2Nh4awHzyb0AAJs6do01VUBJq3r0O3uougJgI s9sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYsI9GmqS/ae6izw6TxnoFHdglCC1RncCagkKQTHf1ZuTzIAQnr YywMBAZke7FjMIyT7Ajy4cz8x4lvROfZPQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XKOa0F2x3vxauth/h0HvPbkZ+SqENRkpl7xU4xN1mcGgJygx/kcZrStaokMZsFu53+2rFHKg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:d7d3:: with SMTP id o202mr3516324wmg.135.1544551479444; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:04:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from flashbox ([2a01:4f8:10b:24a5::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm1074859wmd.0.2018.12.11.10.04.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:04:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:04:37 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11 Message-ID: <20181211180437.GA28010@flashbox> References: <20181211182627.42b79e40@canb.auug.org.au> <20181211173851.GA29028@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181211173851.GA29028@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:38:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:26:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20181210: > > > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. > > > > The ubifs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. > > > > The rdma tree still had its build failure so I used the version from > > next-20181203. > > > > The tip tree gained a conflict against the hwmon-staging tree. > > > > The gpio tree lost its build failure. > > > > The akpm-current tree lost its build failure but gained conflist against > > the arm64 tree. > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7744 > > 8462 files changed, 365061 insertions(+), 211977 deletions(-) > > > > Build results: > total: 152 pass: 150 fail: 2 > Failed builds: > arm:allmodconfig > arm64:allmodconfig > Qemu test results: > total: 337 pass: 137 fail: 200 > > Build failures: > > arm: > > In file included from drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge.h:22:0, > from drivers/media/pci/ddbridge/ddbridge-ci.c:19: > arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h:35:50: error: unknown type name 'cpumask_t' > Just FYI, I noticed this one yesterday on next-20181210 and sent a patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20181210233514.3069-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/ > arm64: > > arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.o:(_kprobe_blacklist+0x0): dangerous relocation: > unsupported relocation > > The latter is with gcc 7.3.0. I'll build and try with gcc 7.4.0 and > the most recent binutils later. > > Most of the failing qemu tests fail with something like > > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -95) > > Others (such as aarch64) crash silently. > > Has anyone reported this already, or do I need to run bisect ? > > Guenter Thanks, Nathan