From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Cc: <sandeepsheriker.mallikarjun@microchip.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91: add support in soc driver for new SAM9X60
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:41:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212104110.5584-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> (raw)
From: Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun <sandeepsheriker.mallikarjun@microchip.com>
Add detection of new SAM9X60 by this soc.c driver.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
[nicolas.ferre@microchip.com: split patch]
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun <sandeepsheriker.mallikarjun@microchip.com>
---
drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 2 ++
drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
index 2cc272ddf906..096a83cf0caf 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ static const struct at91_soc __initconst socs[] = {
AT91_SOC(AT91SAM9XE128_CIDR_MATCH, 0, "at91sam9xe128", "at91sam9xe128"),
AT91_SOC(AT91SAM9XE256_CIDR_MATCH, 0, "at91sam9xe256", "at91sam9xe256"),
AT91_SOC(AT91SAM9XE512_CIDR_MATCH, 0, "at91sam9xe512", "at91sam9xe512"),
+ AT91_SOC(SAM9X60_CIDR_MATCH, SAM9X60_EXID_MATCH,
+ "sam9x60", "sam9x60"),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5
AT91_SOC(SAMA5D2_CIDR_MATCH, SAMA5D21CU_EXID_MATCH,
diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h
index ed89b24ecee1..ee652e4841a5 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs);
#define AT91SAM9G45_CIDR_MATCH 0x019b05a0
#define AT91SAM9X5_CIDR_MATCH 0x019a05a0
#define AT91SAM9N12_CIDR_MATCH 0x019a07a0
+#define SAM9X60_CIDR_MATCH 0x019b35a0
#define AT91SAM9M11_EXID_MATCH 0x00000001
#define AT91SAM9M10_EXID_MATCH 0x00000002
@@ -58,6 +59,8 @@ at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs);
#define AT91SAM9N12_EXID_MATCH 0x00000006
#define AT91SAM9CN11_EXID_MATCH 0x00000009
+#define SAM9X60_EXID_MATCH 0x00000000
+
#define AT91SAM9XE128_CIDR_MATCH 0x329973a0
#define AT91SAM9XE256_CIDR_MATCH 0x329a93a0
#define AT91SAM9XE512_CIDR_MATCH 0x329aa3a0
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 10:41 Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2018-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH] ARM: at91: add support in soc driver for new SAM9X60 Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212104110.5584-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=sandeepsheriker.mallikarjun@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox