From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97271C65BAE for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E6020851 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="LL2gSny3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 52E6020851 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728681AbeLMOZw (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:25:52 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:49292 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727707AbeLMOZw (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:25:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RNdAwpOpjcEw5gyuU3aQftdjop2zfLzob/Tq26DDJHw=; b=LL2gSny39IbnWdLneMuNTDPVd 4QMA8s4nvuxWbjA5v+KtHBy4QSYzu3QwpPJjeBP2GktX8pQMxI0QMZ/2P4yTFObHDOWKnrwe7xwGo Yg/PYVrtsBODwZEiP/6m+v4iYiLRKIF1OczVGhCKaH0nU3WnPAf/OZZKJjleTyS9VNVQFHMh/CVZC zaAGkjnSrIOLLzlcSxut7PdRoRaB2unXhUXgfdeBBASLVQbRibHfEl4ULqbskDfUhreO2dng/f1fI 4owRphFHDMHwaut8TKcT9KrKa22gOySIvyLl5SbNq5MvDAjmIH7m3UOUvC78vmWYOim8LARSf8Htt Tp20i7YLQ==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gXRvx-00033Q-9b; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:25:49 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:25:49 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Al Viro , david@fromorbit.com, Linux List Kernel Mailing , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for v4.20-rc6 Message-ID: <20181213142549.GA6708@infradead.org> References: <20181208163639.GR24487@magnolia> <20181211135818.GA29626@infradead.org> <20181212181658.GA24487@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181212181658.GA24487@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:16:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 05:58:18AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Honestly, I really wish you simply wouldn't send me "xfs" fixes that > > > aren't really xfs-specific at all. > > > > > > All the splice patches (and honestly, I feel some of the iomap ones > > > too) that have come in through the xfs tree should have been handled > > > separately as actual VFS patches. Or at least had acks from Al or > > > something. > > > > iomap came in through the XFS tree originally, and has been very much > > maintained in combo, even though we now have another user with gfs. > > > > Maybe we just need to make that official in MAINTAINERS? > > Yes, though who should be the official maintainer? You wrote most of > the iomap code; do you want to maintain it yourself? Or have people > funnel them wherever XFS patches go? :) Well, the original version is from Dave, although I'm not sure if much of that code is left. I think just maintaining it with XFS is a good idea. But if we need an explicit maintainer I can do it.