From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9331BC67839 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D5B214DB for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:16:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789766; bh=m+zIM6n1rDG23MPrC6DN9I4eVhYA1RjTvNailiUXD/g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=xvrHpwZoFI2q0kbguhtJdkVoj+1sDrNTzPHCUqnkKExyyEs5OBEetptgrM3yjoG1A P4CpflgusRPCmapff14i3Noe1tli0V+JY1xmQbqEGR4jaweF3GKL28Z4rvfuSUpTS9 QhD9sHLuE/jtciGN/2QTBO7StvnU2/1bVqZ748Fs= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56D5B214DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732150AbeLNMQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:16:05 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36006 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732649AbeLNMPy (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:15:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1B232133F; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:15:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789753; bh=m+zIM6n1rDG23MPrC6DN9I4eVhYA1RjTvNailiUXD/g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sLMBtZXJA0KC7s21Il/cr5fgnD3QD4ifNU8vLiMaiGz5XW67snL7rUi6VLtge5bda 0Dt8A/nfiAco7cdaPkJ+qpIRvC+lJA68eNwB3R0glE98A2zwNkddOVrm4ocKSeozCl pNC/+vnLFbaS+rl/vV5nOiqAWqE6gQ9SOjTD3HDU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Ben Hutchings Subject: [PATCH 4.4 64/88] bpf/verifier: Pass instruction index to check_mem_access() and check_xadd() Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:00:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20181214115707.623225928@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.0 In-Reply-To: <20181214115702.151309521@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181214115702.151309521@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ben Hutchings Extracted from commit 31fd85816dbe "bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields". Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static bool is_ctx_reg(struct verifier_e * if t==write && value_regno==-1, some unknown value is stored into memory * if t==read && value_regno==-1, don't care what we read from memory */ -static int check_mem_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, +static int check_mem_access(struct verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regno, int off, int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t, int value_regno) { @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct verif return err; } -static int check_xadd(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) +static int check_xadd(struct verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; int err; @@ -791,13 +791,13 @@ static int check_xadd(struct verifier_en } /* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1); if (err) return err; /* check whether atomic_add can write into the same memory */ - return check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1); } @@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env /* check that memory (src_reg + off) is readable, * the state of dst_reg will be updated by this func */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->src_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->src_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, insn->dst_reg); if (err) @@ -1875,7 +1875,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type; if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) { - err = check_xadd(env, insn); + err = check_xadd(env, insn_idx, insn); if (err) return err; insn_idx++; @@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env dst_reg_type = regs[insn->dst_reg].type; /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, insn->src_reg); if (err) @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env } /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ - err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1); if (err)